Managing a duopolistic water market with confirmed proposals. An experiment

Authors

  • Aurora García-Gallego Laboratorio de Economía Experimental (LEE) & Universitat Jaume I
  • Nikolaos Georgantzís Laboratorio de Economía Experimental (LEE). Universitat Jaume I & Granada Lab of Behavioral Economics (GLOBE). University of Granada
  • Roberto Hernán-González Economic Science Institute de Chapman University
  • Praveen Kujal Carlos III University of Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.09.20

Keywords:

Allocation of water, Dynamic duopoly, Endogenous water quality, Games with confirmed proposals

Abstract


We report results from experimental water markets in which owners of two different sources of water supply water to households and farmers. The final water quality consumed by each type of consumer is determined through mixing of qualities from two different resources. We compare the standard duopolistic market structure with an alternative market clearing mechanism inspired by games with confirmed strategies (which have been shown to yield collusive outcomes). As in the static case, complex dynamic markets operating under a confirmed proposals protocol yield less efficient outcomes because coordination among independent suppliers has the usual effects of restricting output and increasing prices to the users. Our results suggest that, when market mechanisms are used to allocate water to its users, the rule of thumb used by competition authorities can also serve as a guide towards water market regulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attanasi, G., García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N. and A. Montesano. 2011. “Non-cooperative games with chained confirmed proposals.” Pp. 19-32 in Contributions to Game Theory and Management edited by L.A. Petrosjan and N.A. Zenkevitch Vol. IV. Forthcoming.

Bar-Shira, Z., Finkelshtain, I. and A. Simhon. 2006. “Block-rate versus uniform water pricing in agriculture: An empirical analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88:986-999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00911.x

García-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Hernán-González R. and P. Kujal (in press) “How do markets manage water resources? An experiment.” Forthcoming at the Enviromental and Resource Economics.

Gardner, R., Moore, M.R. and J.M. Walker. 1997. “Governing a groundwater commons: A strategic and laboratory analysis of western law.” Economic Inquiry 35:218-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01905.x

Georgantzis, N., García-Gallego, A., Fatas, E., Neugebauer, T. and P. Kujal. 2004. “Mixture and distribution of different water qualities: An experiment on vertical structure in a complex market.” Cuadernos de Economía 27:95-138.

Gordon, H.S. 1954. “The economic theory of a common property resource: The fishery.” Journal of Political Economy 62:124-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/257497

Mason, C.F. and O.R. Phillips. 1997. “Mitigating the tragedy of the commons through cooperation: An experimental evaluation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34:148-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1997.1006

McCabe, K.A, Rassenti, S.J. and V.L. Smith. 1989. “Designing ‘smart’ computer assisted markets in an experimental auction for gas networks.” European Journal of Political Economy 5:259-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(89)90049-9

McCabe, K.A., Rassenti, S.J. and V.L. Smith. 1991. “Smart computer assisted markets.” Science 254:534-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.254.5031.534 PMid:17806969

Moench, M. 1992. “Chasing the water table: equity and sustainability in groundwater management.” Economic and Political Weekly 27 (nos. 51-52): A171-A177.

Murphy, J.J., Dinar, A., Howitt, R.E., Rassenti, S.J., and V.L. Smith. 2000. “The design of smart water market institutions using laboratory experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 17:375-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026598014870

Tsur, Y., and A. Dinar. 1997. “The relative efficiency and implementation costs of alternative methods for pricing irrigation water.” World Bank Economic Review 11:243–262.

Varela-Ortega, C., J.M. Sumpsi, A. Garrido, M. Blanco, and E. Iglesias. 1998. “Water pricing policies, public decision making and farmers’ response: implications for water policy.” Agricultural Economics 19:193-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00048-6

Walker, J.M., Gardner, R. and E. Ostrom. 1990. “Rent dissipation in limited access common pool resource environments: experimental evidence.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19:203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90069-B

Walker, J.M. and R. Gardner. 1992. “Probabilistic destruction of Common-pool Resources: experimental evidence.” The Economic Journal 102:1149-1161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234382

Williams, A., Smith, V.L. and J. O. Ledyard. 1986. “Simultaneous trading in two competitive markets: An experimental examination.” Technical report, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-30

How to Cite

García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Hernán-González, R., & Kujal, P. (2012). Managing a duopolistic water market with confirmed proposals. An experiment. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 70(Extra_1), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.09.20

Issue

Section

Articles