The lottery-panel task for bi-dimensional parameter-free elicitation of risk attitudes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.07.1AKeywords:
Decision-making, Lotteries, Psychometric tests, Risk aversionAbstract
In this paper, we propose a simple task for eliciting attitudes toward risky choice, the Sabater-Grande and Georgantzís (SGG) lottery-panel task, which consists in a series of lotteries constructed to compensate riskier options with higher risk-return trade-offs. Using Principal Component Analysis technique, we show that the SGG lotterypanel task is capable of capturing two dimensions of individual risky decision making: subjects’ average willingness to choose risky projects and their sensitivity towards variations in the return to risk. We report results from a large dataset obtained from the implementation of the SGG lottery-panel task and discuss regularities and the desirability of its bi-dimensionality both for describing behaviour under uncertainty and explaining behaviour in other contexts.
Downloads
References
Abdellaoui, M. 2000. “Parameter-free elicitation of utility & probability weighting functions.” Management Science 46:1497-1512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080
Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H. and C. Paraschiv. 2007. “Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement.” Management Science 53:1659-1674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711
Allais, M. 1953. “Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine.” Econometrica 21: 503-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1907921
Andersen, S., Harrison, G., Lau, M. and E. Rutström. 2008. “Eliciting risk and time preferences.” Econometrica 76:583-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00848.x
Bechara, A., Damasio. A. R., Damasio, H. and S.W Anderson. 1994. “Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.” Cognition 50:7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
Berns, G. S., Capra, M., Chappelow, J., Moore, S. and C. Noussair. 2008. “Nonlinear neurobiological probability weighting functions for aversive outcomes.” Neuroimage 15:2047-2057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.028 PMid:18060809 PMCid:2270401
Birnbaum, M. H. and J. Navarrete.1998. “Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17:49-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007739200913
Bosch-Domènech, A. and J. Silvestre. 2006. “Risk aversion and embedding bias.” Economics Working Papers No. 934. Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Spain.
Brañas-Garza, P., Georgantzís, N. and P. Guillén. 2007. “Direct and indirect effects of pathological gambling on risk attitudes.” Judgment and Decision Making 2(2):126-136.
Brañas-Garza, P., Guillén, P. and R. López del Paso. 2008. “Math skills and risk attitudes.” Economics Letters 99:332-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.08.008
Camerer, C. 1989. “An experimental test of several generalized utility theories.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2(1):61-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00055711
Camerer, C. and T. Ho. 1994. “Violations of betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8:167-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01065371
Campo, S., Guerre, E., Perrigne, I. and Q. Vuong. 2002. “Semiparametric estimation of first-price auctions with risk averse bidders.” Working Paper, University of Southern California.
Carbone, E. and J. Hey. 2000. “Which error story is best?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20:161-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007829024107
Cox, J. C. and R. L. Oaxaca. 1996. “Is Bidding behavior consistent with bidding theory for private value auctions.” Pp. 131-148 in Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 6, edited by R.M. Isaac. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Pereira, P. and J.C. Pernías-Cerrillo. 2005. “Competing against simulated equilibrium price dispersions: An experiment on Internet-assisted search markets.” Working Paper #5-12, NET Institute.
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Navarro-Martínez, D. and G. Sabater-Grande. 2011. “The stochastic component in choice and regression to the mean.” Theory and Decision 71:251-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9223-6
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. and M. Parravano. 2010. “The SGG risk elicitation task: Implementation and results.” The Papers 10/04, University de Granada. Spain.
Georgantzís, N., Genius, M., García-Gallego, A. and G. Sabater-Grande. 2003. “Testing for risk return individual decision making.” Working Paper 43/03. LINEEX, University of Valencia. Spain.
Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A. and T. Palfrey. 2002. “Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in privatevalue auctions.” Journal of Economic Theory 104(1):247-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2001.2914
Goeree, J., Holt, C. and T. Palfrey. 2003. “Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennigames.” Games and Economic Behavior 45:97-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00052-6
Goldstein, W. and H. Einhorn. 1987. “Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena.” Psychological Review 94:236-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.236
Harrison, G., List, J. and C. Towe. 2007. “Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion.” Econometrica 75:433-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00753.x
Harrison, G. W. and E. Rutström. 2009. “Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral.” Experimental Economics 12(2):133-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9203-7
Hey, J. and C. Orme. 1994. “Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data.” Econometrica 62:1391-1426. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2951750
Holt, C. A. and S. K. Laury. 2002. “Risk aversion and incentive effects.” American Economic Review 92(5):1644-1655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
Hsu, M., Krajbich, I., Zhao, C. and C. F. Camerer. 2009. “Neural response to reward anticipation under risk is nonlinear in probabilities.” Journal of Neuroscience 29:2231-2237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5296-08.2009 PMid:19228976
Kanheman, D. and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.” Econometrica 47(2):263-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Lusk, J. and K. Coble. 2005. “Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87:393-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00730.x
Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
Prelec, D. 1998. “The probability weighting function.” Econometrica 66:497-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2998573
Rabin, M. and R. H. Thaler. 2001. “Anomalies: Risk aversion.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(1): 219-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.1.219
Raven, J. C. 1976. Advanced Progressive Matrices. Sets I and II. Oxford: Psychologists Press.
Rigas, G., Carling, E. and B. Brehmer. 2002. “Reliability and validity of performance measures in microworlds.” Intelligence 50(5):463-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00121-6
Sabater-Grande, G. and N. Georgantzís. 2002. “Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners’ dilemma games: An experimental test.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48:37-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00223-2
Stott, H. 2006. “Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32:101-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-8289-6
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:297-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
Wakker, P. and D. Deneffe. 1996. “Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown.” Management Science 42(8):1131-1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1131
Wang, M., Rieger, M. O. and T. Hens. 2010. “How time preferences differ: Evidence from 45 countries.” Research Paper No. 09-47. Swiss Finance Institute.
Weber, E. U. and C. K. Hsee, C. K. 1998. “Cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk.” Management Science 44(9):1205-1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
Weber, E.U. and C. K. Hsee. 1999. “Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6(4): 611-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03212969
Zukerman, M. 1979. Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. New York: Erlbaum Associates.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
