Miedo y aversión en la política estadounidense: una revisión teórica

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2024.82.4.1303

Palabras clave:

polarización afectiva, despolarización, emociones, identidad partidista, discriminación

Resumen


La posición del presidente Donald Trump en las encuestas mejoró inmediatamente después de sus múltiples acusaciones penales. Esta evolución ilustra el fenómeno de la polarización afectiva: intenso conflicto y animadversión entre los partidos, y preferencias políticas intransigentes que no responden en absoluto a pruebas sólidas. En este artículo se presenta un breve repaso de las pruebas que documentan la intensificación de la polarización afectiva en Estados Unidos, se identificarán las posibles causas subyacentes de este fenómeno y se ofrecerán algunos comentarios críticos sobre los esfuerzos por desarrollar “tratamientos” que puedan mejorar la animadversión hacia el exterior.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abramowitz, Alan I. & Kyle L.Saunders. 2008. "Is polarization a myth?", Journal of Politics 70: 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493

Allcott, Hunt, LucaBraghieri, SarahEichmeyer & MatthewGentzkow. 2020. "The welfare effects of social media", American Economic Review 110: 629-676. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658

Berinsky, Adam. 2017. "Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation", British Journal of Political Science 47: 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186

Billig, Michael G. & HenriTajfel. 1973. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology3: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030103

Boxell, Levi, MatthewGentzkow & Jesse M.Shapiro. 2017. "Greater Internet use is not associated with Faster Growth in Political Polarization among US Demographic Groups", Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 114: 10612-10617. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706588114 PMid:28928150 PMCid:PMC5635884

Boysen, Guy A., David. L.Vogel & StephanieMadon. 2006. "A public versus private administration of the implicit association test", European Journal of Social Psychology 36(6): 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.318

Broockman, David. E., Joshua L.Kalla & Sean J.Westwood. 2023. "Does affective polarization undermine democratic norms or accountability? Maybe not", American Journal of Political Science 67(3): 808-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12719

Druckman, James, DonaldGreen & ShantoIyengar. 2023. "Does affective polarization contribute to democratic backsliding in America?", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 708(1): 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162241228952

Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J.Abrams & Jeremy C.Pope. 2008. "Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings", Journal of Politics 70: 556-560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160808050X

Flaxman, Seth, SharadGoel & Justin M.Rao. 2016. "Filter bubbles, echo chambers and online news consumption", Public Opinion Quarterly 80(21): 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006

Gaertner, Samuel, John. F.Dovidio, Phyllis A.Anastasio, BettyBachman & Mary C.Rust. 1993. "The Common in group identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup Bias", European Review of Social Psychology 4: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004

Gentzkow, Matthew & Jesse M.Shapiro. 2011. "Ideological segregation online and offline", Quarterly Journal of Economics 126: 1799-1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr044

Gift, Karen & ThomasGift. 2015. "Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized Experiment", Political Behavior 37: 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9286-0

Green, Donald, BradleyPalmquist & EricSchickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Grimmer, Justin & GaryKing. 2011. "General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization", Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108: 1643-1650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018067108 PMid:21292983 PMCid:PMC3041127

Hovland, Carl I., O. J.Harvey & MuzaferSherif. 1957. "Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 55(2): 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048480 PMid:13474895

Huber, Gregory A., & NeilMalhotra. 2017. "Political homophily in social relationships: Evidencefrom online dating behavior", Journal of Politics 79: 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1086/687533

Huddy, Leonie, LillianaMason & LeneAaroe. 2015. "Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity", American Political Science Review 109(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604

Iyengar, Shanto, & Kyu S.Hahn. 2009. "Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use", Journal of communication 59: 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x

Iyengar, Shanto, GauravSood & YphtachLelkes. 2012. "Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization", Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038

Iyengar, Shanto, & Sean J.Westwood. 2015. "Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization", American Journal of Political Science 59: 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152

Iyengar, Shanto & MashaKrupenkin. 2018. "The strengthening of partisan affect", Advances in Political Psychology 39: 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12487

Iyengar, Shanto, TobiasKonitzer & Kent L.Tedin. 2018. "The Home as a Political Fortress: Family Agreement in an Era of Polarization", Journal of Politics 80: 1326-1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/698929

Iyengar, Shanto, YphtachLelkes, MatthewLevendusky, NeilMalhotra & Sean J.Westwood. 2019. "The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States", Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Klofstad, Casey, RoseMcDermott & Peter K.Hatemi. 2013. "The dating preference of liberals and conservatives", Political Behavior 35(3): 519-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9207-z

Levendusky, Matthew. S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001 PMid:19824090

Levendusky, Matthew. S. y NeilMalhotra. 2016. "(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public", Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 378-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv045

Levy, Ro'ee. 2021. "Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment", American Economic Review 111(3): 831-870. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191777

Maccoby, Eleanor E. & NathanMaccoby. 1954. "The Interview: A Tool of Social Science". Pp. 449-487, in The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by GardnerLindzey. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Mason, Lilliana. 2015. "I disrespectfully agree: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization", American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089

Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001

McCarty, Nolan, Keith T.Poole & HowardRosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McConnell, Christopher, NeilMalhotra, YotamMargalit & MatthewLevendusky. 2018. "The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era", American Journal of Political Science 62(1): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12330

Nyhan, Brendan, JaimeSettle, EmilyThorson, MagdalenaWojcieszak, PabloBarberá, Annie Y.Chen, et al.2023. "Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing", Nature 620(7972):137-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06297-w PMid:37500978 PMCid:PMC10396953

Orr, Lilla V. & Gregory A.Huber. 2020. "The policy basis of measured partisan animosity in the United States", American Journal of Political Science 64(3): 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12498

Peterson, Erik, SharadGoel & ShantoIyengar. 2019. "Partisan selective exposure in online news consumption: Evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign", Political Science Research and Methods 7: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.55

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy. How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425

Roccas, Sonia & Marilynn B.Brewer. 2002. "Social identity complexity", Personality and social psychology Review 6(2): 88-106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01

Rogowski, Jon C.2014. "Electoral choice, ideological conflict, and political participation", American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 479-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12059

Rogowski, Jon C. & Joseph L.Sutherland. 2016. "How ideology fuels affective polarization", Political Behavior 38: 485-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7

Sears, David O.1975. "Political Socialization". Pp. 93-153, in Handbook of Political Science (vol. 2), edited by Fred I.Greenstein and Nelson W.Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. "Polarization and partisan selective exposure", Journal of Communication 60(3): 556-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x

Sunstein, Cass R.2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711

Tajfel, Henri & JohnTurner. 1979. "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict". Pp. 33-47 in The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by William G.Austin & StephenWorchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

Theodoridis, Alexander G.2017. "Me, myself, and (I), (D), or (R)? Partisanship and political cognition through the lens of implicit identity", The Journal of Politics 79(4): 1253-1267. https://doi.org/10.1086/692738

Tyler, Matthew, JustinGrimmer & ShantoIyengar. 2022. "Partisan enclaves and information bazaars: Mapping selective exposure to online news", The Journal of Politics 84: 1057-1073. https://doi.org/10.1086/716950

Voelkel, Jan G., MichaelStagnaro, JamesChu, SophiaPink, JosephMernyk, ChrystalRedekopp, et al.2023. "Megastudy identifying effective interventions to strengthen Americans' democratic attitudes", Norhwestern. Institute for Policy Research.

West, Emily A. & ShantoIyengar. 2022. "Partisanship as a social identity: Implications for polarization", Political Behavior 44(2): 807-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09637-y

Publicado

2024-12-30

Cómo citar

Iyengar, S. (2024). Miedo y aversión en la política estadounidense: una revisión teórica. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 82(4), e265. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2024.82.4.1303

Número

Sección

Estado actual de la investigación