Miedo y aversión en la política estadounidense: una revisión teórica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2024.82.4.1303Palabras clave:
polarización afectiva, despolarización, emociones, identidad partidista, discriminaciónResumen
La posición del presidente Donald Trump en las encuestas mejoró inmediatamente después de sus múltiples acusaciones penales. Esta evolución ilustra el fenómeno de la polarización afectiva: intenso conflicto y animadversión entre los partidos, y preferencias políticas intransigentes que no responden en absoluto a pruebas sólidas. En este artículo se presenta un breve repaso de las pruebas que documentan la intensificación de la polarización afectiva en Estados Unidos, se identificarán las posibles causas subyacentes de este fenómeno y se ofrecerán algunos comentarios críticos sobre los esfuerzos por desarrollar “tratamientos” que puedan mejorar la animadversión hacia el exterior.
Descargas
Citas
Abramowitz, Alan I. & Kyle L.Saunders. 2008. “Is polarization a myth?”, Journal of Politics 70: 542-555.
Allcott, Hunt, LucaBraghieri, SarahEichmeyer & MatthewGentzkow. 2020. “The welfare effects of social media”, American Economic Review 110: 629-676.
Berinsky, Adam. 2017. “Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation”, British Journal of Political Science 47: 241-262.
Billig, Michael G. & HenriTajfel. 1973. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology3: 27-52.
Boxell, Levi, MatthewGentzkow & Jesse M.Shapiro. 2017. “Greater Internet use is not associated with Faster Growth in Political Polarization among US Demographic Groups”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 114: 10612-10617.
Boysen, Guy A., David. L.Vogel & StephanieMadon. 2006. “A public versus private administration of the implicit association test”, European Journal of Social Psychology 36(6): 845-856.
Broockman, David. E., Joshua L.Kalla & Sean J.Westwood. 2023. “Does affective polarization undermine democratic norms or accountability? Maybe not”, American Journal of Political Science 67(3): 808-828.
Druckman, James, DonaldGreen & ShantoIyengar. 2023. “Does affective polarization contribute to democratic backsliding in America?”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 708(1): 137-163.
Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J.Abrams & Jeremy C.Pope. 2008. “Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings”, Journal of Politics 70: 556-560.
Flaxman, Seth, SharadGoel & Justin M.Rao. 2016. “Filter bubbles, echo chambers and online news consumption”, Public Opinion Quarterly 80(21): 298-320.
Gaertner, Samuel, John. F.Dovidio, Phyllis A.Anastasio, BettyBachman & Mary C.Rust. 1993. “The Common in group identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup Bias”, European Review of Social Psychology 4: 1-26.
Gentzkow, Matthew & Jesse M.Shapiro. 2011. “Ideological segregation online and offline”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 126: 1799-1839.
Gift, Karen & ThomasGift. 2015. “Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized Experiment”, Political Behavior 37: 653-675.
Green, Donald, BradleyPalmquist & EricSchickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Grimmer, Justin & GaryKing. 2011. “General purpose computer-assisted clustering and conceptualization”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108: 1643-1650.
Hovland, Carl I., O. J.Harvey & MuzaferSherif. 1957. “Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 55(2): 244-252.
Huber, Gregory A., & NeilMalhotra. 2017. “Political homophily in social relationships: Evidencefrom online dating behavior”, Journal of Politics 79: 269-283.
Huddy, Leonie, LillianaMason & LeneAaroe. 2015. “Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity”, American Political Science Review 109(1): 1-17.
Iyengar, Shanto, & Kyu S.Hahn. 2009. “Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use”, Journal of communication 59: 19-39.
Iyengar, Shanto, GauravSood & YphtachLelkes. 2012. “Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization”, Public Opinion Quarterly 76: 405-431.
Iyengar, Shanto, & Sean J.Westwood. 2015. “Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization”, American Journal of Political Science 59: 690-707.
Iyengar, Shanto & MashaKrupenkin. 2018. “The strengthening of partisan affect”, Advances in Political Psychology 39: 201-218.
Iyengar, Shanto, TobiasKonitzer & Kent L.Tedin. 2018. “The Home as a Political Fortress: Family Agreement in an Era of Polarization”, Journal of Politics 80: 1326-1338.
Iyengar, Shanto, YphtachLelkes, MatthewLevendusky, NeilMalhotra & Sean J.Westwood. 2019. “The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States”, Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129-146.
Klofstad, Casey, RoseMcDermott & Peter K.Hatemi. 2013. “The dating preference of liberals and conservatives”, Political Behavior 35(3): 519-538.
Levendusky, Matthew. S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. S. y NeilMalhotra. 2016. “(Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American Public”, Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 378-391.
Levy, Ro’ee. 2021. “Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment”, American Economic Review 111(3): 831-870.
Maccoby, Eleanor E. & NathanMaccoby. 1954. “The Interview: A Tool of Social Science”. Pp. 449-487, in The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by GardnerLindzey. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “I disrespectfully agree: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization”, American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128-45.
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Keith T.Poole & HowardRosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McConnell, Christopher, NeilMalhotra, YotamMargalit & MatthewLevendusky. 2018. “The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era”, American Journal of Political Science 62(1): 5-18.
Nyhan, Brendan, JaimeSettle, EmilyThorson, MagdalenaWojcieszak, PabloBarberá, Annie Y.Chen, et al.2023. “Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing”, Nature 620(7972):137-144.
Orr, Lilla V. & Gregory A.Huber. 2020. “The policy basis of measured partisan animosity in the United States”, American Journal of Political Science 64(3): 569-586.
Peterson, Erik, SharadGoel & ShantoIyengar. 2019. “Partisan selective exposure in online news consumption: Evidence from the 2016 presidential campaign”, Political Science Research and Methods 7: 1-17.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy. How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roccas, Sonia & Marilynn B.Brewer. 2002. “Social identity complexity”, Personality and social psychology Review 6(2): 88-106.
Rogowski, Jon C.2014. “Electoral choice, ideological conflict, and political participation”, American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 479-494.
Rogowski, Jon C. & Joseph L.Sutherland. 2016. “How ideology fuels affective polarization”, Political Behavior 38: 485-508.
Sears, David O.1975. “Political Socialization”. Pp. 93-153, in Handbook of Political Science (vol. 2), edited by Fred I.Greenstein and Nelson W.Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and partisan selective exposure”, Journal of Communication 60(3): 556-576.
Sunstein, Cass R.2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tajfel, Henri & JohnTurner. 1979. “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”. Pp. 33-47 in The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by William G.Austin & StephenWorchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Theodoridis, Alexander G.2017. “Me, myself, and (I), (D), or (R)? Partisanship and political cognition through the lens of implicit identity”, The Journal of Politics 79(4): 1253-1267.
Tyler, Matthew, JustinGrimmer & ShantoIyengar. 2022. “Partisan enclaves and information bazaars: Mapping selective exposure to online news”, The Journal of Politics 84: 1057-1073.
Voelkel, Jan G., MichaelStagnaro, JamesChu, SophiaPink, JosephMernyk, ChrystalRedekopp, et al.2023. “Megastudy identifying effective interventions to strengthen Americans’ democratic attitudes”, Norhwestern. Institute for Policy Research.
West, Emily A. & ShantoIyengar. 2022. “Partisanship as a social identity: Implications for polarization”, Political Behavior 44(2): 807-838.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.
