PRESENTATION. Experimental and behavioral economics. Theory, tools and topics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2011.04.15Keywords:
Decision making, Experimental economics, MarketsAbstract
This note presents the special issue on Experimental and Behavioral Economics. The volume includes some recent contributions from these correlated disciplines –empirical the former and theoretical the latter– and their potential contribution to the intersection of Economics with Psychology and Sociology. The project “El papel de la comparación social en las decisiones económicas bajo incertidumbre” (Junta de Andalucía, P07- SEJ-03155)” provided us with inspiration and financial support to publish this volume.
Downloads
References
Ballester, C. and P. Hernández 2012. “Bounded Rationality.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1:27-38.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Brandford Books: MIT Press.
Barreda, I., García-Gallego, A., Pavan, M. and Gerardo Sabater 2012. “Demand response in experimental electricity markets.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1:127-165.
Brandts, J. and E. Fatás 2012. “Social preferences.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1: 113-126.
Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. and M. Repollés 2012. “Time discounting and pain anticipation: Experimental evidence.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1:73-81.
Budría, S., Lacomba, J.A., Lagos, F. and P. Swedberg 2012. “When obese people are more patient than non-obese people: a study of post-surgery individuals in a weight loss association.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1: 83-98.
Coricelli, G and R. Nagel 2012. “The neural basis of bounded rational behavior.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1:39-52.
Croson, R. and U. Gneezy 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47: 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448
Ergun, S., García-Muñoz, T. and M. F. Rivas 2012. “Gender Differences in Economic Experiments.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1: 99-111.
Espinosa, M.P., Kovárík, J. and G. Ponti 2012. “Strategic Interaction and Conventions.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1: 15-26.
Fehr E. and U. Fischbacher 2003. “The Nature of Human Altruism.” Nature 425: 785-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02043 PMid:14574401
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. and M. Parravano 2012. “The lottery-panel task for bi-dimensional parameter-free elicitation of risk attitudes.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1: 53-72.
García-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Hernán, R. and P. Kujal 2012. “Managing a duopolistic wáter market with confirmed proposals: An experiment.” Revista Internacional de Sociología, Extra 1: 189-213.
García-Martínez, J.A., Gutiérrez-Hita, C. and Sánchez-Soriano, J. 2012. Competitiveness, cooperation, and strategic interaction. An oligopoly classroom experiment. Revista Internacional de Sociología Extra 1: 167-187.
Glimcher, P.W., C. Camerer, R.A. Poldrack and E. Fehr 2008. Neuro-economics: Decision Making and the Brain, Academic Press 2008.
Gneezy, U., M. Niederle, and A. Rustichini 2003. “Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1049-1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698496
Nagel, R. 1995. Unraveling in Guessing Games: An experimental Study. The American Economic Review 85: 1313-1326.
Schelling, T. 1963. The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
