Time and inequality in labor and family dynamics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.1.16.183

Keywords:

Flexibility, Gender, Social policy, Time use, Work-Family Balance

Abstract


The social changes in last decades have modified the time use of individuals. However, how time is used varies according to the position occupied within the social structure. This paper argues that the social inequality in the power over the time use is increasing among different socioeconomic statuses, while social policies are failing in their equalizer potential. To do so, this essay critically synthetizes three recent published books covering the cases of United States, France and Spain. Three elements that shape the social organization of time are being discussed: (a) the dependency among different social groups in time’s control and the endogeneity between family time and work time; (b) the ambivalence of flexibility regarding its relation with gender and socioeconomic status; and (c) the need for a new assessment of the social policies designated to protect the workers’ family time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albott, A. y Tsay, A. 2000. "Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology". Sociological Methods and Research 29 (1): 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124100029001001

Cano, T. 2014. "Los cuidados en conflicto. De la Ley de Dependencia a las estrategias de cuidados familiares". Tesis de Máster, Departamento de Sociología IV, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.

Castell, M. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford University Press: New York.

Clawson, D. and Gerstel, N. 2014. Unequal Time: Gender, Class and Family Employment Schedules. New York: Russell Fundation.

Connell, R. W. (2005): Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Elias, N. 1982. Sociología Fundamental. Barcelona: Gedisa. PMCid:PMC1273997

Espa-a. 1999. "Ley 39/1999, de 5 de noviembre, para promover la conciliación de la vida familiar y laboral de las personas trabajadoras". Boletín Oficial del Estado 266: 38934-38942, 6 de Noviembre de 1999.

Espa-a. 2006. "Ley 39/2006, de 14 de diciembre, de Promoción de la Autonomía Personal y Atención a las personas en situación de dependencia". Boletín Oficial del Estado 299: 44142 a 44156, 15 de Diciembre del 2006.

Espa-a. 2007. "Ley Orgánica 3/2007 de 22 de marzo, para la igualdad efectiva de mujeres y hombres". Boletín Oficial del Estado 71: 12611 a 12645, 23 de Marzo de 2007.

Fiorini, M. y Keane, M. 2014. "How the allocation of children's time affects cognitive and noncognitive development". Journal of Labour Economics 32(4): 787-834. https://doi.org/10.1086/677232

Gerson, K. 2011. The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work and Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hochschild, A. 1997. The Time Bind. When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. Holt Paperbacks: New York.

Hakim, C. 2000. Work-lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lapuerta, I. 2011. Employment, Motherhood and Parental Leaves in Spain. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Pompeu Fabra: Barcelona. PMCid:PMC3202482

Martín Criado, E. y Prieto, C. comp. 2015. Conflictos por el tiempo: Poder, relación salarial y relaciones de género. Madrid: UCM/CIS.

Mauss, M. 2009. Ensayo sobre el don. Forma y función del intercambio en las sociedades arcaicas. Katz Editores: Buenos Aires.

Serrano, A. et al. 2014. "Crisis de los cuidados, Ley de Dependencia y confusión semántica". Revista Internacional de Sociología 71(3): 669-674. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.07.30

Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury: London.

Zerubavel, E. 1979. Patterns of Time in Hospital Life: A Sociological Perspective. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

Published

2017-03-30

How to Cite

Cano, T. (2017). Time and inequality in labor and family dynamics. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 75(1), e056. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.1.16.183

Issue

Section

Research Note