Amartya Sen from social mirror of freedom. Limits to Individual Capabilities Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.3.038Keywords:
Counter-Capability, Freedom, Meta-Capability, Social CapabilityAbstract
This paper illustrates somehow aspect of the capabilities approach developed by the economist and philosopher Amartya Sen. Particularly it examines how the concept of freedom (as “opportunity”) reveals unable to empirically and normatively adjust to the notion of freedom as capability. From such categorical contradiction is introduced a set of unprecedented concepts that, gathered to the largest social dimension of freedom, allow releasing from such mismatch. Conclusions are focused on the emphasis of social environment as state that far from its recognized influence on individual capabilities has potentially enablers’ elements.
Downloads
References
Agee, M. y T. Crocker. 2012. "Operationalizing the Capability Approach to Assessing Well-being". Journal of Socio- Economics 46: 80-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.07.003
Berlin, I. 2002. Sobre la libertad. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Cejudo, R. 2007. "Capacidades y libertad. Una aproximación a la teoría de Amartya Sen". Revista Internacional de Sociología 65:9-22.
Cohen, G. 1996. "¿Igualdad de qué? Sobre el bienestar, los bienes y las capacidades". Pp. 222-243 en La calidad de vida, compilado por M. Nussbaum. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Cortina, A. 2002. Por una ética del consumo. Madrid: Taurus.
Deneulin, S. 2006. Transforming Unjust Structures the Capability Approach. The Netherlands: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4432-1 PMid:17409893
Deneulin, S. 2011. "Development and the Limits of Amartya Sen's The Idea of Justice". ThirdWorldQuarterly 32:787- 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.567008
Deneulin, S. 2014. Well-being, Justice and Development Ethics. London: Routledge.
Deneulin, S. y McGregor. 2010. "The Capability Approach and the Politics of a Social Conception of Well-being". European Journal of Social Theory 13:501-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368431010382762
Giri, A. 2000. "Rethinking Human Well-being: a dialogue with Amartya Sen". Journal of International Development 12:1003-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:7<1003::AID-JID698>3.0.CO;2-U
Leßmann, O. 2012. "Applying the Capability Approach Empirically: An Overview with Special Attention to Labor". Management Review 23:99-118.
Nozick, R. 1988. Anarquía, estado y utopía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Nussbaum, M. 2002. Las mujeres y el desarrollo humano: el enfoque de las capacidades. Barcelona: Herder.
Nussbaum, M. 2011. "Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique". Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12:23-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541731
Otaga, S. 2003. "Human Security and State Security". New York: Comisión de Seguridad Humana, Human Security Now.
Rawls, J. 1971. Una teoría de la justicia. Boston: Harvard University Press. PMCid:PMC2609853 PMCid:PMC2609853
Robeyns, I. 2005. "The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey". Journal of Human Development 6:25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
Robeyns, I. 2009. "Equity and Justice". Pp. 101-120 en An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency, editado por S. Deneulin y L. Shahani. London: Earthscan. PMCid:PMC2790901
Sen, A., R. Muellbauer, K. Kanbur y K. Hart. 1987. "The Standard of Living". The Tanner Lectures in Human Values, editado por G. Hawthorn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511570742
Sen, A. 1973b. On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198281935.001.0001
Sen, A. 1982. "Liberty as Control: An Appraisal". Journal of Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7:207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1982.tb00092.x
Sen, A. 1984. Goods and People. Cambridge, Mas.: MIT press.
Sen, A. 1985a. "Well-being, Agency and Freedom". Journal of Philosophy 82:169-221.
Sen, A.1985b. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sen, A. 1998. "Freedom and Choice: Concept and Content". European Economic Review 32:269-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. 2000. Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Madrid: Alianza.
Sen, A. 2002b. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. 2003. Sobre Ética y Economía. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Sen, A. 2004. "Capabilities, List and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation". Feminist Economics 10:77-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163
Sen, A. 2006. "What do we Want from a Theory of Justice?" Journal of Philosophy 103:215-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517
Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Group.
Sen, A. 2013. "The Ends and Means of Sustainability". Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14:6-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747492
Streeten, P. 1984. "Basic Needs: some Unsettled Questions". World Development 12:973-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(84)90054-8
Steward, F. 2013. "Nussbaum on the Capabilities Approach". Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14:156-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.762175
Uribe López, M. 2009. "Metas blandas y metas duras en el enfoque de Desarrollo Humano". Revista de la Universidad Bolivariana 8:181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-65682009000200009
Van Parijs, P. 1996. Libertad real para todos. Qué puede justificar el capitalismo (si hay algo que pueda hacerlo). Barcelona: Paidós.
Van Staveren, I. 2001. The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164037
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.