Amartya Sen from social mirror of freedom. Limits to Individual Capabilities Approach

Authors

  • Manuel Antonio Jiménez Castillo El Colegio de la Frontera Norte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.3.038

Keywords:

Counter-Capability, Freedom, Meta-Capability, Social Capability

Abstract


This paper illustrates somehow aspect of the capabilities approach developed by the economist and philosopher Amartya Sen. Particularly it examines how the concept of freedom (as “opportunity”) reveals unable to empirically and normatively adjust to the notion of freedom as capability. From such categorical contradiction is introduced a set of unprecedented concepts that, gathered to the largest social dimension of freedom, allow releasing from such mismatch. Conclusions are focused on the emphasis of social environment as state that far from its recognized influence on individual capabilities has potentially enablers’ elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agee, M. y T. Crocker. 2012. "Operationalizing the Capability Approach to Assessing Well-being". Journal of Socio- Economics 46: 80-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.07.003

Berlin, I. 2002. Sobre la libertad. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Cejudo, R. 2007. "Capacidades y libertad. Una aproximación a la teoría de Amartya Sen". Revista Internacional de Sociología 65:9-22.

Cohen, G. 1996. "¿Igualdad de qué? Sobre el bienestar, los bienes y las capacidades". Pp. 222-243 en La calidad de vida, compilado por M. Nussbaum. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Cortina, A. 2002. Por una ética del consumo. Madrid: Taurus.

Deneulin, S. 2006. Transforming Unjust Structures the Capability Approach. The Netherlands: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4432-1 PMid:17409893

Deneulin, S. 2011. "Development and the Limits of Amartya Sen's The Idea of Justice". ThirdWorldQuarterly 32:787- 97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.567008

Deneulin, S. 2014. Well-being, Justice and Development Ethics. London: Routledge.

Deneulin, S. y McGregor. 2010. "The Capability Approach and the Politics of a Social Conception of Well-being". European Journal of Social Theory 13:501-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368431010382762

Giri, A. 2000. "Rethinking Human Well-being: a dialogue with Amartya Sen". Journal of International Development 12:1003-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:7<1003::AID-JID698>3.0.CO;2-U

Leßmann, O. 2012. "Applying the Capability Approach Empirically: An Overview with Special Attention to Labor". Management Review 23:99-118.

Nozick, R. 1988. Anarquía, estado y utopía. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Nussbaum, M. 2002. Las mujeres y el desarrollo humano: el enfoque de las capacidades. Barcelona: Herder.

Nussbaum, M. 2011. "Capabilities, Entitlements, Rights: Supplementation and Critique". Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 12:23-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.541731

Otaga, S. 2003. "Human Security and State Security". New York: Comisión de Seguridad Humana, Human Security Now.

Rawls, J. 1971. Una teoría de la justicia. Boston: Harvard University Press. PMCid:PMC2609853 PMCid:PMC2609853

Robeyns, I. 2005. "The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey". Journal of Human Development 6:25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266

Robeyns, I. 2009. "Equity and Justice". Pp. 101-120 en An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency, editado por S. Deneulin y L. Shahani. London: Earthscan. PMCid:PMC2790901

Sen, A., R. Muellbauer, K. Kanbur y K. Hart. 1987. "The Standard of Living". The Tanner Lectures in Human Values, editado por G. Hawthorn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511570742

Sen, A. 1973b. On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198281935.001.0001

Sen, A. 1982. "Liberty as Control: An Appraisal". Journal of Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7:207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1982.tb00092.x

Sen, A. 1984. Goods and People. Cambridge, Mas.: MIT press.

Sen, A. 1985a. "Well-being, Agency and Freedom". Journal of Philosophy 82:169-221.

Sen, A.1985b. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Sen, A. 1998. "Freedom and Choice: Concept and Content". European Economic Review 32:269-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0

Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. 2000. Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Madrid: Alianza.

Sen, A. 2002b. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. 2003. Sobre Ética y Economía. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Sen, A. 2004. "Capabilities, List and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation". Feminist Economics 10:77-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163

Sen, A. 2006. "What do we Want from a Theory of Justice?" Journal of Philosophy 103:215-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517

Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Group.

Sen, A. 2013. "The Ends and Means of Sustainability". Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14:6-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747492

Streeten, P. 1984. "Basic Needs: some Unsettled Questions". World Development 12:973-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(84)90054-8

Steward, F. 2013. "Nussbaum on the Capabilities Approach". Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14:156-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.762175

Uribe López, M. 2009. "Metas blandas y metas duras en el enfoque de Desarrollo Humano". Revista de la Universidad Bolivariana 8:181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-65682009000200009

Van Parijs, P. 1996. Libertad real para todos. Qué puede justificar el capitalismo (si hay algo que pueda hacerlo). Barcelona: Paidós.

Van Staveren, I. 2001. The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203164037

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

Jiménez Castillo, M. A. (2016). Amartya Sen from social mirror of freedom. Limits to Individual Capabilities Approach. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 74(3), e038. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.3.038

Issue

Section

Articles