Durkheim and Simmel, Two Sociological Ways?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.i51.107Keywords:
Clasical Sociology, Comparative Sociology, Sociological Method, Sociological TheoryAbstract
Simmel and Durkehim, whose 150 anniversary of their births we celebrate this year, represent apprently two opposing modes of doing sociology, and two conceptions of society. Precisely for that reason, they invite contrast and comparison. Though differences between Simmel and Durkheim in style, findings, method and subject matter remain obvious, there are also considerable coincidences and a substantial degree of convergence in their approach. This commemorative essay attemps to identify these elements and top show how both classical thinkers can, indeed must, be integrated into the common ground upon which contemporary sociology thrives and advances.
Downloads
References
Boudon, R. (1979), La logique du social, París, Hachette.
Boudon, R. (1995), ‘Weber and Durkheim: Beyond the differences’, Revue Int. de Philosohie, Vol. II, no. 192, pp. 221-239.
Cherkaoui, M. (2008), Durkheim and the Puzzle of Social Complexity, Oxford, Bardwell Press
Deroche-Gurcel, L. (1997), Simmel et la modernité, París, Presses Universitaires de France.
Köhnke, K.C. (1996), Der Junge Simmel, Frankfurt del Main, Suhrkamp.
García, J.L. (2007), “Cultura y tecnología en Georg Simmel”, en O. Sabido (comp.) Georg Simmel: una revisión contemporánea, Barcelona, Anthropos y Universidad A. M. de México, pp. 314 y ss.
Giner, S. (1974), El progreso de la conciencia sociológica, Barcelona, Península.
Lukes, S. (1973), Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work, Londres, Allen Lane.
Maffesoli, M. (1988), “Ein Vergleich zwischen Emile Durkheim und Georg Simmel”, en O. Rammstedt (ed.), Simmel und die frühen Soziologen Francfort del Meno: Suhrkamp, pp. 165-180.
Nisbet. R. (1957), Sociology as an Art Form, Londres, Heinemann.
Simmel, G. (1991), The Philosophy of Money, Londres y Nueva York, Routledge.
Simmel, G. (1944), Schopenhauer y Nietzsche, Buenos Aires, Edición facsimil de la Schapire (traducción de Francisco Ayala).
Simmel, G. y O. VARA (2004), “La fundamental homogeneidad de las teorías monetarias de Georg Simmel y Ludwig von Mises”, Procesos de Mercado, Vol. I. no. 1, pp. 223-247.
Weizbort, L. (2006) As Aventuras de Georg Simmel San Pablo, Brasil, Editora 34.
Wolff, K. H. (comp.) (1950), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, New York, Free Press.
Vara, O. (2004), “La fundamental homogeneidad de las teorías monetarias de Georg Simmel y Ludwig von Mises”, Procesos de Mercado, Vol. I. no. 1, pp. 223-247.
Wolff, K. H. “The Challenge of Durkheim and Simmel”, (1958) American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 590-613. doi:10.1086/222354
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
