Female leadership. An analysis of how gender-related differences influence training and development in associations of African immigrants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2012.09.24Keywords:
Associations, Conflict, Gender, Immigration, Leadership, Socialization, Sociology of Intercultural EducationAbstract
This study describes, analyses and compares manifestations of female leadership in associations of African immigrants, examining such factors as work objectives, themes and forms, organisation and institutionalisation. It was based on an in-depth analysis of ten life hi stories, starting from the hypothesis that there is a clearly gender-based difference between the objectives of African associations comprised of men and of women and that this difference stems from the basic inequality of the respective social statuses of men and women and, more specifically, from gender-related culture. The results obtained suggest the existence of “strong” (neither submissive nor ignorant) female immigrants with the capacity to lead associations, but whose character is not the result of any supposedly specifically “feminine” characteristics, but rather to a process of early (adolescent) learning, academic success and relatively high social origin, all of which help to forge a certain rebellious streak and to lead certain women to assume positions of authority. Whatever the case, it was not possible to observe any relevant differences between female and male leadership; both tend to be characterised by a certain “charisma” and the presence of personal qualities that were the result of interactions within specific social contexts.
Downloads
References
Bales, R. F. 1950. “A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction.” American Sociological Review 15:257-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2086790
Barberà, E., M. Sarrio y A. Ramos. 2000. Mujeres directivas: promoción profesional en España y Reino Unido. Colección Quaderns Feministes 2. Valencia: Institut Universitari d’Estudis de la Dona.
Bass, B. M. y B. J. Avolio. 1990. Transformational leadership development: Manual for de Multifactor leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bass, B. M. y B. J. Avolio. 1994. “Shatter the Glass Ceiling: Women May Make Better Managers”. Human Resource Management 33:549-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330405
Bass, B. M. 1998. Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beauvoir, S. 1949. El segundo sexo. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veinte.
Blake, R. y J. Mouton. 1964. The managerial grid: key orientations for achieving production through people. Houston, Texas: Gulf.
Cantó, N., A. Castiñeira y A. Font. 2009. Les fonts del lideratge social. Barcelona: Fundación Jaume Bofill.
Chinchilla, N. y C. León. 2004. La ambición femenina. Cómo reconciliar trabajo y familia. Madrid: Santillana.
Covey, S. R. 1996. “Los tres papeles que desempeña el líder del nuevo paradigma”. Pp. 177-189 en El líder del futuro, editado por F. Hesselben, M. Goldsmith y R. Beckhard. Bilbao: Deusto, The Drucker Foundation, Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.
Druskat, V. U. 1994. “Gender and leadership style: transformational and transactional leaderships in the Roman Catholic Church”. Leaderships Quarterly 5:99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(94)90023-X
Eagly, A. y L. Carli. 2003. “The female leadership advantage: an evaluation of the evidence”. The Leadership Quarterly 14:807-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
Fiedler, F. E. 1974. “El estudio del liderazgo. El modelo de la contingencia”. Pp. 911-955 en Teoría e investigación en la Psicología Social actual, editado por J. R. Torregrosa. Madrid: M. I.O.P.
Fisher, H. 2000. El primer sexo. Las capacidades innatas de las mujeres y cómo están cambiando el mundo. Madrid: Grupo Santillana.
Gardner, H. 1998. Mentes líderes. Una anatomía del liderazgo. Madrid: Paidós.
Gibb, C. A. 1969. “Leadership”. Pp. 270 en The Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by G. Lindzey and E. Aronson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. 1989. Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haslam, S. A. 2004. “Leadership”. Pp. 566-568 in The Social Science Encyclopedia, vol. II, edited by A. Kuper. London: Routledge.
Hollander, E. P. y J. W. Julian. 1974. “Tendencias actuales en el análisis de los procesos de liderazgo”. Pp. 957-974 en Teoría e investigación en la Psicología Social actual, editado por J. R. Torregrosa. Madrid: Instituto de la Opinión Pública.
Homans, G. [1950] 1963. El grupo Humano. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
Joly, D. 1987. “Associations among the Pakistani Population in Britain”. Pp. 62-85 en Immigrants Associations in Europe, editado por J. Rex, D. Joly y C. Wilpert. Gower: Alderhot.
Juliano, D. y K. Lurbe. 2000. “Mujeres estructuralmente viajeras: estereotipos y estrategias”. Papers 60:381-389.
Martínez, A. 2011. “Liderazgo, género e identidad étnica en Ecuador”. Comunidad Virtual de Gobernabilidad - Comunidad Virtual de Desarrollo Humano e Institucional. Consultado 22 de Noviembre 2011 (http://www.gobernabilidad.cl/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1396).
Mead, M. 1971. Cultura y compromiso. Buenos Aires: Granica.
Peters, T. 2005. La esencia del liderazgo. Madrid: Pearson.
Puigvert, L. y B. Muñoz. 2012. “Estudios de género. Barreras y aportaciones al debate teórico internacional desde las voces de las ‘otras mujeres’”. Géneros. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies 1:4-27.
Pujadas, J. J. 1992. El método biográfico: el uso de las historias de vida. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS).
Nye, J. C. 2011. Las cualidades del líder. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ramos, A., M. Sarrio, E. Barberá y C. Candela. 2002. “Mujeres directivas y demandas organizacionales”. Revista de Psicología Social 17:183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347402320007591
Ruiz Olabuénaga, I. 2003. Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
Sipi, R. 2000. “Las asociaciones de mujeres ¿agentes de integración social?”. Papers 60:355-364.
Szepanti, J. 1978. “El método biográfico”. Papers 10:229-256.
Weber, M. [1922] 1984. Economía y Sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.