The movement for decent housing in Spain or the reasons for the failure a widely supported social protest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.12.01Keywords:
Access to Housing, Urban Protest, Social MovementAbstract
Before the 2008 international economic crisis opinion polls showed that Spanish people consider the “housing issue” as one of their main priorities. As a result of this, a social movement that was centered on this problem came of age in 2003. The movement acquired a renewed impetus and social impact with the establishment of a new organization in 2006: the Assembly for Decent Housing. Led basically by youngsters and students, the Assembly has brought about the development of a “new and less traditional” movement for decent housing (MDH) and has embarked itself into a contentious strategy that has taken people to the streets. In spite of the importance attached to the issue, the new MDH has proved unable to capitalize on this “popular” grievance. Radical framing, inability to establish broad social alliances and unwillingness to cooperate with potentially influential political allies might explain why this organization has failed to develop upon a successful social movement.
Downloads
References
Aguilar Fernández, Susana y Ana Ballesteros Peña. 2004. “Debating the Concept of Political Opportunities in Relation to the Galician Social Movement ‘Nunca Mais’.” South European Society & Politics 9: 28-53. doi:10.1080/1360874042000271852
Aguilar Fernández, Susana. 2007. “Contexto político y protesta: el movimiento por los derechos civiles en Estados Unidos (1933-68).” Revista de Estudios Políticos 136: 11-49.
Alberdi, Inés. 1999. La nueva familia española. Madrid: Taurus.
Berry, Jeffrey M. ed. 1997. The Interest Group Society. Nueva York. Longman.
Betancor Nuez, Gomer. 2008. Los rebeldes sin casa. El movimiento por una vivienda digna. Mimeo. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. 2008. Barómetro del año 2008.
DeGroot, Gerard. ed. 1998. Student Protest. The Sixties and After. Londres y Nueva York: Longman.
Della Porta, Donatella. 1995. “Social Movements and the State: Thoughts on the Policing of Protest.” EUI working paper RSC 95/13.
Della Porta, Donatella y Mario Diani. 2006. Social Movements. An Introduction. Malden y Oxford: Blackwell.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
Fernández Gibaja, Alberto y Javier Roldán Martín. 2007. Análisis de un movimiento social: movimiento contra la precariedad y por una vivienda digna (Madrid). Mimeo.
George, Alexander L. y Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Study and Theory Development in the Social Science. Cambridge y Londres: MIT Press.
Goodwin, Jeff y James M. Jasper. 2003. The Social Movements Reader. Cases and Concepts. Malden y Oxford: Blackwell.
Gordon, Bertram. 1998. “The Eyes of the Marcher: Paris, May 1968 —Theory and Its Consequences—.” en Student Protest. The Sixties and After, edited by Gerard DeGroot. London and New York: Longman. pp.
Gamson, William. 1992. “The Social Psychology of Collective Action.” Pp.53-76 en Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, compilado por Bert Klandermanst et al. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald. 2003. “Changing Values in post-Industrial Societies.” Pp. 64-71 en The Social Movements Reader. Cases and Concepts, compilado por Jeff Goodwin y James M. Jasper. Cases and Concepts. Malden y Oxford: Blackwell.
Kaldor, Mary. 2005. La sociedad civil globalizada. Barcelona: Editorial Tusquest.
Katzenstein, Mary. 1995. “Discursive Politics and Feminist Activism in the Catholic Church.” Pp. 35-52 Feminist Organization: Harvest of the New Women’s Movement, compilado por Myra M. Ferre y Patricia Y. Martin. Filadelfia: Temple University Press.
King, G., Robert O. Keohane y Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Klandermans, Bert. 1988. “The Formation and Mobilization of Consensus.” en From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures. International Social Movement Research, vol. 1, edited by en Klandermans et al. Greenwich: JAI.
Klein, Naomi. 2001. No Logo. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.
Manin, Bernard. 1998. Los principios del gobierno representativo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
McAdam, Doug. 1982. The Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
McAdam, Doug. 1988. Freedom Summer. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Patterson, James T. 1996. Grand Expectations. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Pérez-Díaz, Víctor et al. 1998. Familia y sistema de bienestar en España. La experiencia española con el paro, las pensiones, la sanidad y la educación. Madrid: Fundación Argentaria/Visor.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. 2008. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing as a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living. Miloon Kothari.
Zolov, Eric. 1998. “Protest and Counterculture in the 1968 Student Movement in Mexico.” Pp.70-84, en Student Protest. The Sixties and After, edited by Gerard DeGroot. London and New York: Longman.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.