Distintas aproximaciones a la elección racional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2004.i37.239Keywords:
Social Theory, Rational Action, MethodologyAbstract
An introduction to rational choice is included in this paper and a rational choice theories classification is later explained. ThAn introduction to rational choice is included in this paper and a rational choice theories classification is later explained. The instrumentalist rational choice states that the theory is acceptable if its theoretical predictions are valid, regardless of whether the theory is correct or incorrect. The realist rational choice considers that the rational choice is correct, but that it requires other suppositions, normally taken from psychology, such as the cognitive theory. Rational reconstruction of the action, framed in the weberian tradition, considers rational choice as a way of understanding social action by means of empathy, ascribing meaning to it. Formal reconstruction asserts that the rational choice is not really a theory, but simply a useful grammar to consider the social problems. Statistic reconstruction upholds that the rational choice is valid to explain an ideal type of actor, representative of a group; each actor can be different, but the institutional restrictions produce empirical regularities for the group.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2004-04-30
How to Cite
Martínez García, J. S. (2004). Distintas aproximaciones a la elección racional. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 62(37), 139–173. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2004.i37.239
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.