Social Perceptions of Agri-Environmental Property Rights. The Andalusian Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.i51.113Keywords:
Environmental implications, Externality, Institutional ChangeAbstract
This paper uses the 2005 “Survey on Individuals’ Opinion on Rurality and Agriculture in Andalusia. Agrobarometre 2005” to empirically investigate the relevance of agri-environmental property rights as dynamic social institutions upon which the agriculture-environment-society relationship is based. Gaining a better understanding on individuals’ perceptions of agri-environmental property rights will be of particular relevance to contribute agri-environmental policy evaluation and development. Results indicate the existence of an increasing environmental awareness among individuals in Andalusia who support the implementation of eco-compatible practices among farmers.
Downloads
References
Baneth, M. H. (1994), “Medio ambiente y agricultura: ¿Una cuestión de derechos de propiedad?”, Revista de Estudios Agro-Sociales, n.º 168, pp. 69-90.
Barzel, Y. (1989), Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Baumol, W.J. y W.E. Oates (1988), The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bericat, E. (2002), “Valores tradicionales, modernos y posmodernos en la sociedad andaluza”, en E. Moyano y M. Pérez Yruela (coord.), La Sociedad Andaluza [2000], Córdoba, IESA, pp. 45-64.
Braden, J. (1982), “Emerging rights in agricultural land”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 64, n.º 1, pp. 19-27.
Bromley, D. W. (1989), Economic interest and institutions. The conceptual foundations of public policy, Nueva York, Basil Blackwell.
Bromley, D. W. (1991), Environment and Economy: Property rights and public policy, Blackwell, Oxford.
Bromley, D. W. (1996), The Environmental Implications of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper, Series 401.
Bromley, D. W. (1997), “Constitutional political economy: Property claims in a dynamic world”, Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 1, n.º 4, pp. 43-55.
Bromley, D. W. (2003), “Land-use policy as volitional pragmatism”, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, vol. 32, n.º 1, pp. 9-17.
Bromley, D.W. y I. Hodge (1990), “Private Property Rights and Presumptive Policy Entitlements: Reconsidering the Premises of Rural Policy”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 17, n.º 2, pp. 197-214.
Christman, J. (1994), The myth of property, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. E. y A. J. Oswald (1994), “Unhappiness and Unemployment”, Economic Journal, vol. 104, n.º 424, pp. 648-659.
Coase, R. H. (1960), “The problem of social cost”, The Journal of Law and Economics, n.º 3, pp. 1-44.
Demsetz, H. (1967), “Towards a theory of property rights”, American Economics Review, vol. 57, n.º 2, pp. 347-359.
Everitt, B S. y G. Dumm (2001), Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Londres, Arnold.
Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. y P. Frijters (2004), “How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?”, Economic Journal, n.º 114, pp. 641-659.
Goldstein, J.H. y W.D. Watson (1997), “Property rights, regulatory taking, and compensation: Implications for environmental protection”, Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 15, n.º 4, pp. 32-42.
Hair, F. J., R.E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham y W. C. Black (1999), Análisis Multivariante, Madrid, Prentice Hall.
Hervieu, B. (1997), Los campos del futuro, Madrid, MAPA.
Hodge, I. y D. Ortiz (2007), “An institutional transactions approach to property rights adjustment: an application to Spanish agriculture”, Environment and Planning, en prensa.
IESA, Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (2006), “Opinión Pública, Agricultura y Sociedad Rural en Andalucía” (Agrobarómetro 2005), Informe Síntesis, Informes y Monografías E-0304, IESACSIC, Córdoba.
Ilbery, B. W. y I. R. Bowler (1998), “From agricultural productivism to post-productivism”, en B. W. Ilbery (coord.), The geography of rural change, Harlow, Longman, pp. 57-84.
Latacz-Lohmann, U. y I. Hodge (2003), “European agri-environmental policy for the 21st century”, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 47, n.º 1, pp. 123-139.
Moyano, E. (2005), “Nuevas orientaciones de la política europea de desarrollo rural”, Revista de Fomento Social, nº 238, pp. 219-242.
Moyano, E. y F. Garrido (1998), “Acción colectiva y política agroambiental en la Unión Europea”, Política y Sociedad, nº 28, pp. 85-101.
Moyano, E. y A. Paniagua (1998), “Agricultura, espacios rurales y medio ambiente”, Revista Internacional de Sociología, nº 19-20, pp. 127-152.
OECD (1998), Agriculture and the Environment: Issues and Policies, París, OECD.
Ortiz, D. y V. Estruch (2004), “The role of agri-environmental measures in the definition of property rights”, en G. Van Huylenbroeck, W. Verbeke y L. Lauwers (coord.), Role of Institutions in Rural Policies and Agricultural Markets, Amsterdam, Elsevier. pp. 335-348.
Paniagua, A. (2001), “European Processes of Environmentalization in Agriculture: A View from Spain”, en H. Buller y K. Hoggart (coord.), Agricultural Transformation, Food and Environment, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 131-164.
Pigou, A. (1920), The Economic of Welfare, Londres, MacMillan.
Whitby, M. (ed.) (1996), The European Environment and CAP Reform: Policies and Prospects for Conservation, CAB Internacional, Wallingford.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.