Meritocracy and economic inequality: Perceptions, preferences and implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.1.17.114Keywords:
Distributive justice, Economic inequality, Inequality perception, Meritocracy, Social statusAbstract
The idea of meritocracy is related to the distribution of goods and rewards based on individual talent and effort, being a principle that legitimizes the unequal distribution of resources in modern societies. Despite the constant references to meritocracy in inequality and stratification research, there are still few conceptual and empirical attempts to understand to what extent individuals perceive and prefer meritocracy, as well as their consequences. The present research proposes a conceptual and empirical framework for studying meritocratic perceptions and preferences, which is then related with economic inequality variables. Using data from the Chilean survey “Social justice and citizenship participation” (N= 1,245), the analyses suggest that meritocratic perceptions and preferences are different constructs and that those perceiving an adequate functioning of meritocracy also perceive less economic inequality.
Downloads
References
Aalberg, T. 2003. Achieving Justice: Comparative Public Opinion on Income Distribution. Leiden: Brill.
Adams, J. 1963. "Towards an Understanding of Inequity". Journal of Abnormal Psychology 67(5): 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968 PMid:14081885
Alon, S. y M. Tienda. 2007. "Diversity, Opportunity, and the Shifting Meritocracy in Higher Education". American Sociological Review 72(4): 487-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200401
Aristóteles 1999. Nichomaquean Ethics. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Baer, D. y R. Lambert. 1982. "Education and support for dominant ideology". Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 19(2): 173-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1982.tb00859.x
Bell, D. 1977. Las contradicciones culturales del capitalismo. México: Alianza.
Bourdieu, P. y J. Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Theory, culture & society, London: Sage Publications
Breen, R. y J. H. Goldthorpe. 2001. "Class, mobility and merit the experience of two British birth cohorts". European sociological review 17(2): 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/17.2.81
Castillo, J.C. 2012. "Is inequality becoming just? Changes in public opinion about economic inequality in Chile". Bulletin of Latin American Research 31(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2011.00605.x
Costa-Lopes, R., J. F. Dovidio, C. R. Pereira y J. Jost. 2013. "Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future". European Journal of Social Psychology 43(4): 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1966
Crosby, F. 1979. "Relative deprivation revisited: A response to Miller, Bolce, and Halligan". The American Political Science Review 73(1): 103-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954733
Davidov, E., B. Meuleman, J. Cieciuch, P. Schmidt y J. Billiet. 2014. "Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research". Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
Deutsch, M. 1975. "Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as a Basis of Distributive Justice?". Journal of Social Issues 31(3): 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x
Duru-Bellat, M. y E. Tenret. 2012. "Who's for Meritocracy? Individual and Contextual Variations in the Faith". Comparative Education Review 56(2): 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1086/661290
Foster, M. D. y E. M. Tsarfati. 2005. "The Effects of Meritocracy Beliefs on Women's Well-Being After First- Time Gender Discrimination". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(12): 1730-1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205278709 PMid:16254092
Goldthorpe, J. H. 2003. "The myth of education-based meritocracy". New Economy 10(4): 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0041.2003.00324.x
Hadjar, A. 2008. Meritokratie als Legitimationsprinzip. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Homans, G. 1974. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcouit Brace Jovanovich.
Horowitz, I. L. 2006. "The Moral Economy of Meritocracy: or, the Unanticipated Triumph of Reform and the Failure of Revolution in the West". The Political Quarterly 77: 127- 133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00789.x
Jaime-Castillo, A.M. e I. Marqués-Perales. 2014. "Beliefs about Social Fluidity and Preferences for Social Policies". Journal of Social Policy 43(3): 615-633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000221
Janmaat, J.G. 2013. "Subjective inequality: A review of international comparative studies on people's views about inequality". European Journal of Sociology 54(3): 357- 389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975613000209
Jost, J., S. Blount, J. Pfeffer y G. Hunyadi. 2003. "Fair Market Ideology: Its Cognitive-Motivational Underpinnings". Research in Organizational Behavior 25: 53-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4
Kline, R. 2011. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Kluegel, J. y E. Smith. 1981. "Beliefs About Stratification". Annual Review of Sociology 7: 29-56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.07.080181.000333
Krebs, A. 2000. Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Kunovich, S. y K. M. Slomczynski. 2007. "Systems of Distribution and a Sense of Equity: A Multilevel Analysis of Meritocratic Attitudes in Post-industrial Societies". European Sociological Review 23(5): 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcm026
Lane, R. 1986. "Market Justice, Political Justice". The American Political Science Review 80(2): 383-402. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958264
Lerner, M. 1980. The Belief in a Just World. A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5
Lipset, S. 1959. "Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy". The American Political Science Review 53(1): 69-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
Meltzer, A. y S. Richard. 1981. "A Rational Theory of the Size of Government". The Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914-927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013
Oxfam. (2016). An economy of the one percent. Recuperado desde: https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/economy-1
Page, O. 2013. "Mérito e igualdad de oportunidades". Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 33(2): 533-545. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2013000200006
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542
Reynolds, J. y H. Xian. 2014. "Perceptions of meritocracy in the land of opportunity". Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 36: 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2014.03.001
Rosseel, Y. (2012). "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling". Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sandel, M. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810152
Schneider, S.M. y J. C. Castillo. 2015. "Poverty Attributions and the Perceived Justice of Income Inequality A Comparison of East and West Germany". Social Psychology Quarterly 78(3): 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515589298
Schröder, M. 2017. "Is Income Inequality Related to Tolerance for Inequality?". Social Justice Research 30(1): 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-016-0276-8
Sen, A. 2000. "Merit and Justice". Pp. 5-16 in: Meritocracy and economic inequality, edited by Arrow, K. J, S. Bowles and S. N. Durlauf. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press,.
Solt, F. 2010. "Does Economic Inequality Depress Electoral Participation? Testing the Schattschneider Hypothesis". Political Behavior 32(2): 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9106-0
Solt, F., Y. Hu, K. Hudson, J. Song y D. "Erico" Yu. 2016. "Economic inequality and belief in meritocracy in the United States". Research & Politics 3(4): 2053168016672101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168016672101
Son Hing, L. S., D. R. Bobocel, M. P. Zanna, D. M. Garcia, S. S. Gee y K. Orazietti. 2011. "The merit of meritocracy". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(3): 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024618 PMid:21787093
Stouffer, S., E. A. Suchman, L. C. Devinney, S. A. Star y R. M. Williams. 1949. The American Soldier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tocqueville, A. 2004. El Antiguo Régimen y la Revolución. Ediciones AKAL.
Walker, I. y T. F. Pettigrew. 1984. "Relative deprivation theory: an overview and conceptual critique". British Journal of Social Psychology 23: 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00645.x
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York Oxford: Basic Books.
Warikoo, N.K. y C. Fuhr. 2014. "Legitimating status: perceptions of meritocracy and inequality among undergraduates at an elite British university". British Educational Research Journal 40(4): 699-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3108
Wegener, B. 1990. Equity, Relative Deprivation, and the Value Consensus Paradox. Social Justice Research 4(1): 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048536
Yair, G. 2007. "Meritocracy". Pp. 2954 - 2958 in: G. Ritzer, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by G. Ritzer. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Young, M. 1962. The Rise of the Meritocracy. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
