Huilliche energy. Experiments in integration and ontological disagreements in a wind farm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.4.17.06Keywords:
Indigenous People, Ontological politics, Participation, Wind PowerAbstract
The island of Chiloé, in southern Chile, was the mise-en-scene of an unprecedented project: the development of a wind farm in which the Hulliche community, the ancestral people of the area, would own and run the operation. With the support of the Inter-American Development Bank, the aim of the project was the production of sustainable and renewable energies, but more importantly the integration of indigenous communities into the Chilean society via their participation in a high-value economic enterprise. Drawing on the idea of citizen participation as a form of experimentation, in this article we follow ethnographically the process of incubation, development and failure of this project. The case, we argue, allows a reflection about the risk of cultural aggression embedded in participatory experiments, but also about their capacities to crack open productive spaces for identity, political and ethical speculation. We coin the term “ontological disagreements” to indicate the ambivalences of participatory experiments and to debate about the future of indigenous engagement in energy projects.
Downloads
References
BID, Banco InterAmericano de Desarrollo. 2016. Programa de Desarrollo y Fomento Indígena. Recuperado de http://www.iadb.org/es/proyectos/project-information-page,1303.html?id=CH-L1105
Blaser, M. 2016. "Is Another Cosmopolitics Possible?" Cultural Anthropology 31(4): 545-570. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05
Boccara, G. y P. Bolados. 2010. "¿Qué es el multiculturalismo? La nueva cuestión étnica en el Chile neoliberal". Revista de Indias 70(250): 651-690. https://dx.doi.org/10.3989/revindias.2010.021 https://doi.org/10.3989/revindias.2010.021
Bonelli, C. 2012. "Ontological Disorders: Nightmares, Psychotropic Drugs and Evil Spirits in Southern Chile". Anthropological Theory 12(4): 407-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499612469587
Braun, K. y S. Schultz. 2009. "'… a Certain Amount of Engineering Involved': Constructing the Public in Participatory Governance Arrangements". Public Understanding of Science 19(4): 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509347814 PMid:20977180
Cadena, M. de la 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds.
Campos, L. 2002. "La problemática indígena en Chile. De las políticas indígenas a la autonomía cutural". Revista de la academia 2: 39-58.
Chapman, C. 2013. "Multinatural Resources: Ontologies of Energy and the Politics of Inevitability in Alaska". Pp. 96-109 en Cultures of energy: Power, practices, technologies, editado por S. Strauss, S. Rupp, and T. F. Love. New York y London: Routledge.
Colebrook, C. 2016. What Is the Anthropo-Political? Pp. 81- 125 en Twilight of the Anthropocene Idols, editado por T. Cohen, C. Colebrook y J. H. Miller. London: Open Humanities Press. PMid:26211826
CONADI. 2008. Informe de la Comisión Verdad Histórica y Nuevo Trato con los Pueblos Indígenas. Recuperado de http:// www.memoriachilena.cl/602/articles-122901_recurso_2.pdf
Devine-Wright, P. 2014. Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation. London: Routledge. PMid:24448027
Deleuze, G. y F. Guattari. 2000. Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
Derrida, J. 1993. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, The Work of Mourning & the New International Mendeley. London: Routledge Classics.
Felt, U. y M. Fochler. 2010. "Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement". Minerva 48(3): 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x
Gross, M. 2015. "Give Me an Experiment and I Will Raise a Laboratory". Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(4): 613-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915617005
Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
Hinchliffe, S. 2007. Geographies of nature, societies, environments, ecologies. London: Sage.
Horvath-Kiss, A. 2015. La revolución de los territorios y de las energías. Santiago de Chile: LOM.
Howe, C. y D. Boyer. 2015. "Aeolian Politics". Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16(1): 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022564
Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: Pergamon Press Ltd.
Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. PMCid:PMC338299
Latour, B and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: SAGE publications.
Latour, B. 2004. "Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics? Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck". Common Knowledge 10(3): 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-10-3-450
Lezaun, J. 2007. "A Market of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups". Sociological Review 55(2): 130- 51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00733.x
Lezaun, J. y L. Soneryd. 2007. "Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics". Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 279-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079371
Lezaun, J., N. Marres y M. Tironi. 2016. "Chapter 7: Experiments in Participation". Pp. 195-222 en The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Fourth ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marres, N. 2012. Material Participation. Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137029669 PMCid:PMC3626128
Michael, Mike. 2009. "Publics Performing Publics: Of PiGs, PiPs and Politics". Public Understanding of Science 18(5): 617-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098581
Mol, A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, UK: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
Muniesa, F. y M. Callon. 2007. "Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets". Pp. 163-189 en Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics, editado por D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa y L. Siu. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Newbold, K. y M. Foulkes. 2004. "Geography and Segmented Assimilation: Examples from the New York Chinese". Population, Space and Place 10(1): 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.301
Povinelli, E. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394570 PMCid:PMC3082744
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2011. "Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things". Social studies of science 41(1): 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301 PMid:21553641
Rancière, J. 1996. El desacuerdo. Política y filosofía. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Rheinberger, H-J. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488856
Schillmeier, M. 2011. "Unbuttoning Normalcy - on Cosmopolitical Events". The Sociological Review 59(3): 514-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02019.x
Shapin, S. y S. Schaffer. 1989. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Star, S. L. y J.R. Griesemer. 1989. "Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: "Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39". Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Stengers, I. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stengers, I. 2005. "The cosmopolitical proposal". Pp. 994- 1003 en Making Things Public, editado por B. Latour y P. Weibel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tironi, M. 2014. "Atmospheres of indagation: disasters and the politics of excessiveness". Sociological Review 62(S1): 114-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12126
Tironi, M. 2015. "Disastrous Publics: counter-enactments in participatory experiments". Science, Technology & Human Values 40(4): 564-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914560649
Tironi, M. 2016. Ningún acuerdo possible: conflictos, diferencia radical y política especulativa.Pp. 131-181 en Conflictos, controversias y disyuntivas, editado por Araya, R. y F. Ceballos. Santiago de Chile: ABIERTA.
Tironi, M. y J. Barandiaran. 2014. "Neoliberalism as political technology: expertise, energy and democracy". Pp. 305-330 en Beyond Imported Magic: Studying Science and Technology in Latin America in Chile, editado por C. Medina, I. Costa Márques y C. Holmes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tsing, A. 2011. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press. PMCid:PMC4324750
Vergara, J. I., R. Foerster y H. Gundermann. 2005. "Instituciones mediadoras, legislación y movimiento indígena de DASIN a CONADI (1953-1994)". Atenea (Concepción) 491: 71-85. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-04622005000100006
Viveiros De Castro, E. 2004. "Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation". Tipiti: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2(1): 2-22. Recuperado de http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol2/iss1/1/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.