The public acceptance of Hydrogen Fuel Cell applications in Europe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.4.17.01Keywords:
Attitudes, Energy technologies, SurveyAbstract
There is increasing realisation amongst policy makers and industry that ‘social acceptance’ is a key issue in the deployment of low carbon energy technologies and infrastructures in Europe. The development of hydrogen fuel cell technologies (HFCs) involves small-scale residential and transport applications, as well as large-scale infrastructures, the socio-technical embedment of which will be influenced by the public and stakeholders in various roles. Previous research on public acceptance has investigated public perceptions of HFCs in specific countries. Here we present survey data on a multi-country scale, using a multivariate, socio-psychological approach. We particularly focus on cross-country differences in self-reported awareness and familiarity, global attitude and support in relation to mobile and residential HFC applications. Our data shows that less than half of the population in the seven countries are aware of the existence of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies in the context of energy production. The level of familiarity with both applications is low, and less than 10% of respondents consider themselves familiar with these applications. In general, respondents in the seven countries have a positive initial attitude towards HFC technologies and are likely to accept and support the adoption of residential fuel cells and HFCEVs. The seven populations studied are similar in their attitudes towards HFC technologies, but there are small to moderate differences in awareness and acceptance of HFC applications across countries. We finally found that positive and negative affect, perceived benefits, preference for alternative technologies, trust, and age were significant correlates of acceptance of HFC applications. We consider the implications of these differences for the public acceptance of HFCs.
Downloads
References
Achterberg, P. 2012. "Knowing Hydrogen and Loving It Too? Information Provision, Cultural Predispositions, and Support for Hydrogen Technology among the Dutch." Public Understanding of Science, 23(4): 445-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512453117 PMid:23825254
Achterberg, P. 2014. "The Changing Face of Public Support for Hydrogen Technology Explaining Declining Support among the Dutch (2008–2013)." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39(33):18711–18717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.053
Achterberg, P., D. Houtman, S. Van Bohemen and K. Manevska. 2010. "Unknowing but Supportive? Predispositions, Knowledge, and Support for Hydrogen Technology in the Netherlands." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35(12):6075–6083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.091
Air Resources Board, California Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Annual Evaluation of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Deployment and Hydrogen Fuel Station Network Development. https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/ zevprog/ab8/ab8_report_2015.pdf
Altmann, M., P. Schmidt, R. Wurster, T. O'Garra, S. Mourato, L. Garrity and S. Whitehouse. 2004. "AcceptH2: Public Acceptance and Economic Preferences Related to Hydrogen Transport Technologies in Five Countries". Paper presented in the 15th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Yokohama, Japan.
Altmann, M., P. Schmidt, S. Mourato and T. O'Garra. 2003. "Analysis and Comparisons of Existing Studies." Study in the framework of the ACCEPTH2 project. Final report (http://accepth2.com/results/docs/WP3_final-report.pdf)
Ammermann, H., P. Hoff, M. Atanasiu, J. Aylor, M. Kaufmann and O. Tisler. 2015. Advancing Europe's energy systems: Stationary fuel cells in distributed generation. A study for the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union (http://www.fch.europa.eu/sites/default/ files/FCHJU_FuelCellDistributedGenerationCommercialization_0.pdf)
Bellaby, P. and A. Clark. 2014. "Lay Discourse about Hydrogen Energy and the Environment: Discussion by Young People and Adults Following a First Visit to a Hydrogen Research and Demonstration Centre." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39(27):15125–15133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.090
De Best-Waldhober, M. and Daamen, D., 2006. Public perceptions and preferences regarding large scale implementation of six CO2 capture and storage technolo- gies. Centre for Energy and Environment Studies, Leiden University, Working Paper.
Dodds, P. E., I. Staffell, A. D. Hawkes, F. Li, P. Grünewald, W. McDowall and P. Ekins. 2015. "Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: A review". International journal of hydrogen energy, 40(5), 2065-2083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.059
Eberle, U., B. Müller and R. von Helmolt. 2012. "Fuel cell electric vehicles and hydrogen infrastructure: status 2012". Energy & Environmental Science, 5(10), 8780-8798. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22596d
Eurobarometer. 2007. Energy Technologies: Knowledge, Perception, Measures. Brussels: European Commission.
Fleishman, L.A., W. Bruine De Bruin, M.G. Morgan. 2010. "Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies". Risk Analysis 30, 1399–1410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01436.x PMid:20561264
Heinz, B. and G. Erdmann. 2008. "Dynamic effects on the acceptance of hydrogen technologies—an international comparison". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(12), 3004-3008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.068
Heo, J. and S. Hoon Yoo. 2013. "The Public's Value of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses: A Contingent Valuation Study." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38(11):4232– 4240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.166
Huijts, N. M. A., J. I. M. De Groot, E. J. E. Molin, and B. van Wee. 2013. "Intention to Act towards a Local Hydrogen Refueling Facility: Moral Considerations versus Self-Interest." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 48:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.006
Huijts, N. M., E. J. E. Molin, and L. Steg. 2012. "Psychological Factors Influencing Sustainable Energy Technology Acceptance: A Review-Based Comprehensive Framework." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(1):525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
Huijts, N. M., E. J. E. Molin, and B. van Wee. 2014. "Hydrogen Fuel Station Acceptance: A Structural Equation Model Based on the Technology Acceptance Framework." Journal of Environmental Psychology 38:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.008
Huijts, N. M. and B. van Wee. 2015. "The Evaluation of Hydrogen Fuel Stations by Citizens: The Interrelated Effects of Socio-Demographic, Spatial and Psychological Variables." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40(33):10367– 10381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.131
O'Garra, T., S. Mourato and P. Pearson. 2008. "Investigating Attitudes to Hydrogen Refuelling Facilities and the Social Cost to Local Residents." Energy Policy 36:2074– 2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.026
Pietzner, K. et al. 2011. "Public Awareness and Perceptions of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS): Insights from Surveys Administered to Representative Samples in Six European Countries." Energy Procedia 4:6300– 6306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.645
Ricci, M., P. Bellaby and R. Flynn. 2008. "What Do We Know about Public Perceptions and Acceptance of Hydrogen? A Critical Review and New Case Study Evidence." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33(21):5868–5880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.106
Schmoyer, R., T. Truett, C. Cooper and A. Chew. 2010. Results of the 2008/2009 knowledge and opinions surveys conducted for the u.s. department of energy hydrogen program (http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/ results-20082009-knowledge-and-opinions-surveys-conducted-us-department).
Schmoyer, R. and C. Cooper. 2008. Compendium : Surveys Evaluating Knowledge and Opinions of Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies October 2008. http://cta.ornl.gov/ cta/Publications/Reports/ORNL_TM_2008_151.pdf
Schulte, I., D. Hart and R. Van der Vorst. 2004. "Issues Affecting the Acceptance of Hydrogen Fuel." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29:677–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.09.006
Tarigan, A. K. M., S. B. Bayer, O. Langhelle and G. Thesen. 2012. "Estimating Determinants of Public Acceptance of Hydrogen Vehicles and Refuelling Stations in Greater Stavanger." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37(7):6063–6073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.138
Thesen, G. and O. Langhelle. 2008. "Awareness, Acceptability and Attitudes towards Hydrogen Vehicles and Filling Stations: A Greater Stavanger Case Study and Comparisons with London." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33(21):5859–5867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.006
Truett, T., R. Schmoyer and C. Cooper. 2008. Compendium : Surveys Evaluating Knowledge and Opinions of Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies. http://cta.ornl.gov/ cta/Publications/Reports/ORNL_TM_2008_151.pdf
Van Rijnsoever, F. J., A. Van Mossel and K. P. Broecks. 2015. "Public acceptance of energy technologies: The effects of labeling, time, and heterogeneity in a discrete choice experiment". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 817-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.040
Yetano Roche, M., S. Mourato, M. Fischedick, K. Pietzner and P. Viebahn. 2010. "Public Attitudes towards and Demand for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles: A Review of the Evidence and Methodological Implications." Energy Policy 38(10):5301–5310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.029
Zachariah-Wolff, J. L. and K. Hemmes. 2006. "Public Acceptance of Hydrogen in the Netherlands: Two Surveys That Demystify Public Views on a Hydrogen Economy." Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26(4):339– 345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467606290308
Zimmer, R. and J. Welke. 2012. "Let's Go Green with Hydrogen! The General Public's Perspective." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37(22):17502–17508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.126
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
