Organización y legitimidad de los programas de bienestar. Análisis comparado de once países de la OCDE

Autores/as

  • Inés Calzada Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP-CCHS) (CSIC). Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2010.02.11

Palabras clave:

Actitudes hacia las políticas sociales, Institucionalismo, Opinión pública, Regímenes de bienestar

Resumen


El objetivo principal de este artículo es analizar la relación entre la institucionalización del estado del bienestar (eb) y su legitimidad, es decir, hasta qué punto la forma de organizar el eb afecta a las percepciones que los ciudadanos desarrollan sobre el mismo y, de esta manera, modifica el tamaño y composición de sus bases de apoyo. A fin de cumplir con este objetivo el artículo se estructura de la siguiente forma: en primer lugar presentamos un panorama de la variación internacional en las actitudes hacia tres programas de bienestar (sanidad, pensiones y desempleo). Seguidamente estudiaremos de dónde proviene el apoyo extra que algunos programas consiguen, centrándonos específicamente en comprobar si una alta legitimidad se logra mediante la construcción de consensos inter-clases o inter-ideologías. terminaremos evaluando qué características organizativas concretas son las que correlacionan con el nivel de apoyo popular que un programa recibe.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Andersen, J.G., Pettersen, P.A., Svallfors S. and Uusitalo Hannu. 1999. “The Legitimacy of the Nordic welfare states: Trends, Variations and Cleavages” Pp. 235-261 in Nordic Social Policy. Changing Welfare States, edited by Kautto et al. London: Routledge.

Andre, H.J. and Heien, T. 2001. “Four World of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway and the United States.” European Sociological Review 17(4):337-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/17.4.337

Arriba, A., Calzada, I. and Del Pino, E. 2006. Las actitudes de los españoles hacia el Estado del Bienestar. 1985-2005. Madrid: CIS.

Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. 1998. “A Comparison of Mass Attitudes towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985-1990.” International Journal of Public Opinion 3: 211-236.

Bonoli, G. 1997. “Classifying Welfare States: a Two-dimension Approach.” Journal of Social Policy 26(3):351-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279497005059

Bonoli, G. 2000. “Public attitudes to social protection and political economy traditions in Western Europe.” European Societies, 2(4):431-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713767005

Calzada, I. 2007. ¿Qué Estado del Bienestar queremos? Las opiniones de los ciudadanos sobre cómo son y cómo deberían ser nuestras políticas sociales. Zerbitzuan: Revista de Servicios Sociales del Gobierno Vasco 42: 103-114.

Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. 2000. Fundamentos Sociales de las Economías Postindustriales. Barcelona: Ariel.

Evans, G. 1995. “Why is America Different? Explaining Cross-National Variation in Support for Welfare Redistribution.” Working paper Nº 36 of the Social & Community Planning Research (SCPR). Nuffield College: Oxford.

Ferrera, M. 1993. Citizens and Social Protection. Main results from a Eurobarometer survey. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Ferrera, M. 1996. “The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 6(1):17-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102

Forma, P. 1999. Interests, Institutions and the Welfare State: Studies on Public Opinion Towards the Welfare State, STA KES (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health) Research Report 102. Turku: University of Turku.

Fraile, M. and Ferrer, M. 2004. “Explaining variation in public support for cuts in level of unemployment benefits spending across OECD countries.” Working paper 2004/208. Madrid: Fundación Juan March.

Gevers, J., Gelissen, J., Arts, W. and Muffels, R. 2000. “Public healthcare in the balance: exploring popular support for healthcare systems in the European Union.” International Journal of Social Welfare, 9:301-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2397.00141

Giddens, A. 2000. “Positive Welfare.” 378-388 in The Welfare State Reader, edited by Pierson & Castles. London: Polity Press.

Gundelach, P. 1994. “National Value Differences. Modernization or Institucionalization?.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 35(1-2):37-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002071529403500103

King, D. S. 1987. “The state and the social structures of welfare in advanced industrial democracies.” Theory and Society 16: 841-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00138071

Korpi, Walter and Palme, J. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries.” American Sociological Review 63:661-687.

Korpi, W. 2000. “Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics 7(2):127-191.

Haller, M., Hoellinger, F. and Raubal, O. 1990. “Leviathan or Welfare State? The Role of Government in Six Advanced Western Nations.” in Attitudes to Inequality and the Role of Government, edited by J.W. Becker et al. Rijswijk: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

Lin, Ka . 2005. “Cultural traditions and the Scandinavian Social Policy model.” Social Policy & Administration 39 (7):723-739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00466.x

Lipsmeyer, Ch.S. and Nordstrom, T. 2003. “East versus West: comparing political attitudes and welfare preferences across European societies.” Journal of European Public Policy 10(3): 339-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000085342

Mishra, R. 1996. “The Welfare of Nations.” Pp. 316-333 in States Against Markets, the Limits of Globalization, edited by Boyer & Drache. London: Routledge.

Moreno, L. 2002. “Mediterranean Welfare and ‘Superwomen’.” Working paper 02-02 de la Unidad de Políticas Comparadas. Madrid: CSIC. (http://hdl.handle.net/10261/1496).

North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pierson, P. 1993. “When Effect becomes cause. Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45:595-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2950710

Svallfors, S. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13(3):283-304.

Svallfors, S. 2003. “Welfare Regimes and Welfare Opinions: a Comparison of Eight Western Countries.” Social Indicators Research 64: 495-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025931414917

Svallfors, S. 2002. “Political trust and support for the Welfare State: Unpacking a supposed relationship.” Pp. 184-205 in Restructuring the Welfare State, edited by Bo Rothstein & Sven Steinmo. New York: Palgrave.

Taylor-Gooby, P., Hastie, C. and Bromley, C. 2003. “Querulous Citizens: Welfare Knowledge and the Limits to Welfare Reform.” Social Policy and Administration 37(1):1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00320

Titmuss, R. 1955. “The Social Division of Welfare: Some Reflections on the Search for Equity.” Ch. 6 in The Foundations of the Welfare State, edited by Goodin & Mitchell. London: Edward Elgar.

Van Oorschot, W. and Meuleman, B. 2009. “Welfarism and the multidimensionality of welfare state legitimacy. Evidence from The Netherlands 2006 based on Confirmatory Factor Analyses.” Paper presented at the ESPA NET Conference, 18 September, Urbino.

Descargas

Publicado

2012-04-30

Cómo citar

Calzada, I. (2012). Organización y legitimidad de los programas de bienestar. Análisis comparado de once países de la OCDE. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 70(1), 39–75. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2010.02.11

Número

Sección

Artículos