Conceptualizing networks as assemblages. A case study from the Spanish ceramics sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.06.29Keywords:
Assemblages, Innovation, Social NetworksAbstract
Network structures are being used to explain social interactions within and between organisations in many ways that have become very influential. Many of the sociological features of organisations are captured very effectively by network descriptions, but such descriptions also retain serious limitations. Some network theories, for example, are composed of fragmented and internally inconsistent theories, while others depend upon essentialist and reductionist models. Perhaps a more serious problem is that networks describe relationships rather than explain the mechanisms through which these relationships function. This paper introduces the notion of assemblages as a corrective to these problems. The concept offers a clear, though suitably complex, framework with which to clarify the dynamics and structures that afford engagement and enable collective action among diverse elements of organisations. Using brief examples from recent research in the innovation literature, supported by an empirical case study in the Spanish ceramics sector, this paper will illustrate how reconceptualising network relationships in terms of their assemblages enables a more robust and consistent theoretical grounding for network research.
Downloads
References
Ahuja, G. 2000. “Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation: A longitudinal study.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 425–455. doi:10.2307/2667105
Allent, T. J. 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Archer. M. 1995. Realistic Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557675
Bhaskar, R. 1997. “On the Ontological Status of Ideas.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2/3): 139-147
Borgatii, S.P. and P.B. Foster. 2003. “The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology.” Journal of Management 29 (6): 991-1013
Brass, D.J., J. Galaskiewicz, H.R. Greve and W. Tsai. 2004. “Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (6): 795-817 doi:10.2307/20159624
Burkhardt, M.E. and Brass, D.J. 1990. “Changing patterns or patterns of change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 104-127 doi:10.2307/2393552
Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R.S. 2004. “Structural holes and good ideas.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (2): 349-399 doi:10.1086/421787
Callon, M. 1992. “The dynamics of techno-economic networks” Pp. 77–102 en R. Coombs, P. Saviotti, V. Walsh, (coord.) Technological change and company strategies. London: Harcout Brace Jovanovich.
Callon, M. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Callon, M. 2005. “Why Virtualism paves the way to Political Impotence.” Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter 6/2 (February): 3–20
Castell, M. 1996. The Network Society, The Information Age. Oxford: Blackwell.
Collier, S. and ONG. A. 2005. “Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems”. Pp. 3-21. In A. Ong and S. Collier (ed.). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, London: Blackwell.
Cooke, P. and Wills, D. 1999. “Small Firms, Social Capital and the Enhancement of Business Performance through Innovation Programmes.” Small Business Economics 13: 219-234. doi:10.1023/A:1008178808631
Cowan, R. and Jornard, N. (2004), “Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28 (8): 1557-1575 doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002
Debresson, C. and Amesse. F. 1991. “Networks of Innovators.” Research Policy 20 (5): 363-379 doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90063-V
Delanda, M. 2006a. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
Delanda, M. 2006b. “Deleuzian Social Ontology and Assemblage Theory”. Pp. 250-267 M. Fuglsang and B.M. Sorensen (ed.) Deleuze and the Social Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Delanda, M. 2010. Deleuze: History and Science. New York: Atropos.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. 1987. Dialogues. London: Athlone Press.
Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1411-1454 doi:10.1086/230450
Freeman, C. 1991. “Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues.” Research Policy, 20 (5): 499–514. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
Giddens, A. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkley: University of California Press.
Gould, R. 1991. “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune 1871.” American Sociological Review 56 (6): 716-729 doi:10.2307/2096251
Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” The American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360-1380. doi:10.1086/225469
Granovetter, M. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory 1 (1): 201-233 doi:10.2307/202051
Haypes, P. 2008. Assemblages - Rethinking Networks of Innovation within the Ceramics Sector, First International Sociological Association Forum. Barcelona: September 5-8.
Hervas, J.L. and Dalmau, J.I. 2005. “How to Measure IC in Clusters: Empirical evidence.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 7 (3): 354-80
Kilduff, M., Tsai, W. and Hanke, R. 2006. “A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the network research program.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 1031-1048.
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewrick, M.R. Raeside, R. and Peisl, T. 2007. “The Innovator’s Network.” Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 2 (3): 12-24
Lundvall, B. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
Marcus, G.E. and Saka, E. 2006. “Problematizing Global Knowledge – Assemblage.” Theory Culture and Society 23 (2-3): 101-106 doi:10.1177/0263276406062573
Arsden, P.V. 1990. “Network Data and Measurement.” Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435-463 doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251
Meyer-Stamer, J. Maggi, C. and Siebel, S. 2001. “Improving Upon Nature: Creating Competitive Advantage in Ceramic Tile Clusters in Italy, Spain and Brazil”, INEF Report 54
Molina, F.X. 2005. “The Territorial Agglomerations of Firms: A Social Capital Perspective from the Spanish Tile Industry.” Growth and Change 35 (1): 74-99 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00267.x
Molina, F.X., Martinez, M.T., Ares, M.A. and Hoffman V.E. 2008. La Estructura y Naturaleza del Capital Social en las Aglomeraciones Territoriales de Empresas. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.
Moreno, A. 2006. “Ceramic Tiles: Above and Beyond Traditional Applications.” Cerámica y Vidrio 45 (2): 59-64.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1977. “In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation.” Research Policy 6 (1): 36-76. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4
Obstfeld, D. 2005. “Social Networks, the Tertius Lungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 100-130
Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W.W. 2004. “Knowledge networks as channels and conduits.” Organization Science 15 (1): 5-21 doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
Padgett, J.F. and C.K. Ansell. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6): 1259-1319 doi:10.1086/230190
Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S. and Ralston, D. 2006. “New frontiers in network theory development.” Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 560–568
Powell, W.W., K. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1): 116-145 doi:10.2307/2393988
Russo, M. 1985. “Technical Change and the Industrial District: the role of Interfirm Relations in the Growth and Transformation of Ceramic Tile Production in Italy.” Research Policy 14 (6): 329-343 doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90003-4
Salancik, G.R. 1995. “WANTED: A good network theory of organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (2): 345– 349 doi:10.2307/2393642
Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Sorenson, O. 2003. “Social Networks and Industrial Geography.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13 (5): 513-527 doi:10.1007/s00191-003-0165-9
Tracey, P. and G.L. Clark. 2003. “Alliances, Networks and Competitive Strategy: Rethinking Clusters and Innovation.” Growth and Change, 34 (1): 1-16 doi:10.1111/1468-2257.00196
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B. and S.D. Berkowitz. 1997. Social Structures: A Network Approach. Greenwich: JAI Press.
White, H.C. 1995. “Social networks can resolve actor paradoxes in economics and in psychology.” Social Structures 151: 58–74.
Yu, G., J. Gao, J.C. Hummelen, F. Wudl and A.J. Heeger. 1995. “Polymer Photovoltaic Cells: Enhanced Efficiencies via a Network of Internal Donor-Acceptor Heterojunctions.” Science 270: 1789–1791. doi:10.1126/science.270.5243.1789
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
