Growth Rings in the Tree of Science. The Institucional Evolution of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2007.07.13Keywords:
Public research centers, Organizational change, Science organizations, Science policyAbstract
What factors affect the organizational models of the large national public research centers? How does organizational change affect the nature of the scientific activities they perform? This article uses the Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) to illustrate an institutional change process taking into account the tension that exists between the public status of research centers and the high level of independence of its scientific communities. The main purpose is to explain how changes in the CSIC’s internal power structure, along with the relationships with external funding and evaluation agencies, cause those research practices considered most legitimate to emerge and produce a reorientation of the entire organization. To that end, a historical account of the CSIC’s situation in the period between the Spanish Democratic Transition and the beginning of the 21st century is provided. The theoretical basis is defined by concepts from new institutionalism in organizational sociology. The results show that during the last quarter of the 20th century, the CSIC has become an organization oriented to basic science. The conclusions have implications for future studies on the transformation of public research centers and for science policy in this field.
Downloads
References
Alonso, S., Fernández, J. R. y Sanz, L. (2001), “Spanish public research centres’ responses to changes: diversification of funding resources”, en D. Cox, P. Gummett y K. Barker (Eds.): Government Laboratories: Transition and Transformation, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001.
Bozeman, B. y Crow, M. (1990), “The environments of US R&D laboratories: political and market influences”, Policy Sciences 23: 25-56. doi:10.1007/BF00136991
Brinton, M. C. y Nee, V. (1998), The new institutionalism in sociology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Castro Martínez, E. y Fernández de Lucio, I. (2007), “Iniciativas institucionales e individuales en la creación de estructuras científicas: el caso del Instituto de Tecnología Química”, Arbor 727: 803-819.
CICYT (2007), Estrategia Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Madrid: Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología.
CSIC (2005a), Memoria de Actividades 2005, Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
CSIC (2005b), Plan de Actuación 2006-2009, Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Colyvas, J. y Powell, W. (2006), “Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries Between Public and Private Sciences”, Research in Organizational Behavior 21: 305-53. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4
Cox, D., Gummett, P. y Baker, H. (eds.) (2001), Government laboratories: transitions and transformations, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Crow, M. y Bozeman, B. (1998), Limited by design. R&D laboratories in the US Innovation System, Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Cruz, L., Sanz, L. y Romero, M. (2004), “Convergencia y divergencia en las políticas de ciencia y tecnología de los gobiernos regionales”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política 11: 31-70.
Drori, G., Meyer, J., Ramírez, F. y Schofer, E. (2003), Science in the modern world: institutionalization and globalization, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘’Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government”, Research Policy 29 (2): 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
DiMaggio, P. J. y Powell, W. W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review 48: 147-160. doi:10.2307/2095101
DiMaggio, P. J. y Powell, W. W. (1991), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dooris, M.J. y Fairweather, J.S. (1994), “Structure and culture in faculty work: implications for technology transfer”, The Review of Higher Education 17-2: 161-177.
EURAB-European Research Advisory Board (2005), Research and Technology Organisations (RTOS) and ERA, Final report EURAB 05.037, December 2005.
Fernández Carro, R. (2001), Regímenes políticos y actividad científica, Madrid: Fundación Juan March.
Fernández de Lucio, I., Rojo de la Viesca, J. y Castro Martínez, E. (2003), Enfoque de Políticas Regionales de innovación en la Unión Europea, Madrid: Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes. Delegación Española.
Fernández Esquinas, M. (2002), La formación de investigadores científicos en España, Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Fernández Esquinas, M., Pérez Yruela, M. y Merchán Hernández, C. (2006), “El sistema de incentivos y recompensas en la ciencia pública española”, en Sebastián, J. y Muñoz. E. (Coords.): Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en España, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Funtowitz, S. y Ravetz, J. (1993), “The emergence of postnormal science”, en Von Schomberg, R. (ed.): Science, Politics and Morality: Scientific uncertainty and decision making, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gangutia Elícegui, E. (2007), “El Diccionario Griego-Español”, Arbor 727: 749-769.
Gibbons, M. et al., (1994), The new production of Knowledge, Londres: Sage.
Godin, B. (1998), “Writting performative history: the New Atlantis?”, Social Studies of Science 28: 465-483. doi:10.1177/030631298028003004
Gouldner, A. (1959), “Cosmopolitans and locals: toward an analysis of latent social roles”, Administrative Science Quarterly 2: 281-306. doi:10.2307/2391000
Guldbransen, M. (2000), “Between Scylla and Charybdis –and enjoying it?: Organizational tensions and research work”, Science Studies 13 (2): 52-76.
Hackett, E. (2001), “Science as a vocation in the 1990’s: the changing organizational culture of academic science”, en Croissant, J. y Restivo, S. (Eds.): Degrees of compromise. Industrial interests and academia values, New York: SUNY Press.
INE (2005), Estadística de Investigación Científica y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
Jang, Y. (2000), “The worldwide funding of ministries of science and technology”, 1950-1900, Sociological Perspectives 43 (2): 247-270.
Jepperson, R. (2002), “The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism”, en Berger, J. y Zelditch, M. (Eds.): New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, Nueva York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kleinman, D. y Valias, S. (2001), “Science, capitalism and the rise of ‘knowledge worker’: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States”, Theory and Society 30 (4): 451-492. doi:10.1023/A:1011815518959
Latour, B. y Woolgar, S. (1982), La construcción de los hechos científicos, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
López García, S. (1999), “El Patronato Juan de la Cierva (1939-1960). III Parte”, Arbor 637: 1-32.
López Facal, J., Ugalde, U., Zapata, A. y Sebastián, J. (2006), “Dinámica de la política científica española y evolución de los actores institucionales”, en Sebastián, J. y Muñoz. E. (Coords.): Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en España, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Martin, B. y Etzkowitz, H. (2000), “The origin and evolution of the university species”, VEST 13 (3-4): 9-34.
Moore, K. (1996), “Organizing integrity: American Science and the creation of Public Interest Organizations”, 1955-1975, American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1592-1627. doi:10.1086/230868
Muñoz, E. y García Arroyo, A. (2006), “El nacimiento de la Ley de la Ciencia: el sueño del progreso”, Revista Madri+d, Diciembre de 2006: 21-25.
Muñoz, E, y Ornia, F. (1987), Ciencia y Tecnología: una oportunidad para España, Madrid: Aguilar
Nieto, A. (Ed.) (1982), Apuntes para una política científica, Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. y Gibbons, M. (2003), “Introduction: `Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge”, Minerva 41, 3: 179-194. doi:10.1023/A:1025505528250
Owen-Smith, J. (2007), “Structural components of institutional change: the shifting field of play for science and commerce in academe”, mimeo.
Owen-Smith, J. y Powell, W. (2001), “Careers and contradictions: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences”, in Research in the Sociology of Work 10: 109-140.
Patronato Juan de la Cierva (1974), Criterios para la Planificación y Programación de Actividades, Madrid: CSIC.
Polanyi, M. (1962), “The Republic of science: Its political and economic theory”, Minerva, 1: 54-73. doi:10.1007/BF01101453
Porter, K., Bunker, K. y Powell. W. (2005), The Institutional Embeddedness of High-Tech Regions, in S. Breschi and F. Malerba (Eds.): Clusters, Networks, and Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Powell, W. (2007), “The New Institutionalism”, en The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
Powell, W., Koput, K. y Smith-Doerr, L. (1996), “Inteorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116-145. doi:10.2307/2393988
Primo Yúfera, E. (1990), “Transición en el CSIC”, Arbor 529: 49-60.
Puig-Samper, M. A. (Coord.) (2007), Tiempos de Investigación. JAE-CSIC: 100 Años de Ciencia en España, Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Sanz, L. (1996), Estado, ciencia y tecnología en España, Madrid: Alianza.
Sanz, L. y Cruz, L. (2003), “Coping with environmental pressures: public research organizations responses to funding crisis”, Research Policy 32 (8): 1293-1308. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00120-8
Scott, R. (2001), Institutions and organizations (Second edition), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott, R. (2005), “Institutional theory: contributing to a theoretical research program”, en Smith, K. y Hitt, M. (Eds.): Greats minds in management: The process of theory development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. (2005), “What is an Institution?”, Journal of Institutional Economics 1(1): 1-22. doi:10.1017/S1744137405000020
Sebastián, J. y López Facal, J. (2007), “Transición y cambio en el CSIC”, en Puig-Samper, M. A. (coords.) op. cit.
Sebastián, J. y Muñoz. E. (Coords.) (2006), Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en España, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Shinn, T. (2002), “The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology”, Social Studies of Science 8, Vol. 32: 599 - 614.
Schneider, M. y Clemens, E. (2006), “The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis”, Sociological Theory, Nº. 24, pp. 195-227.
Tortosa, E. (1991), “La tecnología de alimentos”, en López Piñero, L. (Ed): España: Ciencia, Madrid: Espasa.
Tortosa, E. (2006), “La I+D en el marco autonómico”, en Sebastián, J. y Muñoz. E. (coords.) op. cit.
Vence, J. y J. Heijs (2006), “Estructura y flujos de la financiación de la I+D en España”, en Sebastián, J. y Muñoz. E. (Coords.) op.cit.
Weingart, P. (1997), “From ‘finalization’ to ‘Mode 2’: old wine in new bottles?”, Social Science Information 36: 591-613. doi:10.1177/053901897036004002
Weingart, P., Krücken, G. y Hasse, R. (1997), “Ciencia y entorno social: una aplicación del enfoque neoinstitucionalista a los estudios sociales de la ciencia”, Revista Internacional de Sociología 16: 117-137.
Ziman, J. (1996), “Postacademic science: constructing knowledge with networks and norms”, Science Studies, Nº 9.
Zucker, L. (1987), “Institutional Theories of Organization”, Annual Review of Sociology 13: 443-464. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
