Family background, use of time and information technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.3.17.165Keywords:
Digital divide, Educational homogamy, Family background, Parental care, Use of InternetAbstract
This work examines the effect of family background on the amount of time students devote to the use of new information and communications technology (ICT) and on its type of use. Through an analysis of the frequency and type of use of ICT with data obtained directly from students, our study offers new evidence on the impact of parental education on the time and type of use of ICT for a sample of Spanish students. We show that the educational level of parents reduces the amount of time students devote to the use of Internet and, in turn, increases their propensity to use it for educational purposes. Another empirical finding of our research is that the degree of educational homogamy in the couple exerts an additional effect on the dependent variable.
Downloads
References
Baizán, P., M. Domínguez y M. J. González. 2014. "Couple Bargaining or Socio-Economic Status? Why some parents spend more time with their children than others". European Societies 16(1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2013.859717
Breen, R, y J. H. Goldthorpe. (1997). "Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory". Rationality and Society 9: 275-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346397009003002
Castaño, C. 2008. La segunda brecha digital. Madrid: Cátedra.
Cebolla, H. 2013. Introducción al análisis multinivel. Cuadernos Metodológicos del CIS, 49. Madrid: CIS.
Chalasani, S. 2007. "The Changing Relationship between Parents' Education and their Time with Children". International Journal of Time Use Research 4(1): 93-117. https://doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.4.1.93-117
Fernández-Mellizo, M. y D. Manzano. 2018 "Análisis de las diferencias en la competencia digital de los alumnos españoles". Papers: Revista de Sociología 103(2): 175-198. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2369
Fuchs, T. y L. Woessman. 2004. "Computers and student learning: bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school". Brussels Economic Review 47(3-4): 359-386.
Gil-García, J. R., N. C. Helbig y E. Ferro. 2006. "Is it Only about Internet Access? An Empirical Test of a Multi-dimensional Digital Divide". Pp. 139-149 en Electronic Government, EGOV 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4084, editado por M. A. Wimmer, H. J. Scholl, Ä. Grönlund y K. V. Andersen. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_13
Hargittai, E. 2010. "Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the Net Generation". Sociological Inquiry 80(1): 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
Hargittai, E. y Y. P. Hsieh. 2013. "Digital Inequality". Pp. 129-150 en Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, editado por W. H. Dutton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0007 PMid:26184819
Howard, P., L. Rainie y S. Jones. 2001. "Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology". American Behavioral Scientist 45:383-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764201045003003
Kuhlmeier, H. y B. Hemker. 2007. "The Impact of Computer Use at Home on Students Internet Skills". Computers & Education 49: 460-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.004
Livingstone, S. y E. Helsper. 2007. "Gradiations in Digital Inclusion: Children, Young People and the Digital Divide". New Media and Society 9(4): 671-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
Malamud, O. y C. Pop-Eleches. 2010. "Home Computer Use and the Development of Human Capital". NBER Working Paper Series 15814. http://www.nber.org/papers/ w15814 https://doi.org/10.3386/w15814
Monna, B. y A. H. Gauthier. 2008. "A Review of the Literature on the Social and Economic Determinants of Parental Time." Journal of Family and Economic Issues 29(4): 634-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-008-9121-z
OECD. 2015. Students, Computers and Learning. Making the Connection. Paris: OECD.
OECD. 2017. "Scaling Procedures and Construct Validation of Context Questionnaire Data". Pp. 290-344 en PISA 2015 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.
Pearce, K. E. y R. E. Rice. 2013. "Digital Divides from Access to Activities: Comparing Mobile and Personal Computer Internet Users". Journal of Communication 63(4): 721- 744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045
Ragnedda, M. 2017. The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606002
Selwyn, N. 2004. "Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide." New Media and Society 6(3): 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
Scheeder, A., A. Van Deursen y J. Van Dijk. 2017. "Determinants of Internet Skills, Uses and Outcomes. A Systematic review of Second- and Third-level Digital Divide". Telematics and Informatics 34(8): 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
Sianou-Kyrgiou, E. y I. Tsiplakides. 2012. "Digital Divide: Students' Use of the Internet and Emerging Forms of Social Inequalities". Pp. 55-68 en Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education, editado por A. Jimoyiannis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1083-6_5
Tirado-Morueta, R., A. Hernando-Gómez y J. I. Aguaded-Gómez. 2016. "The Capacity of Elderly Citizens to Access Digital Media in Andalusia (Spain)". Information, Communication & Society 19(10): 1427-1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1111401
Tirado-Morueta, R., D. M. Mendoza-Zambrano, J. I. Aguaded- Gómez e I. Marín-Gutiérrez. 2017. "Empirical Study of a Sequence of Access to Internet Use in Ecuador". Telematics and Informatics 34(4): 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.12.012
Tirado-Morueta, R., J. I. Aguaded-Gómez y A. Hernando- Gómez. 2018. "The Socio-demographic Divide in Internet Usage Moderated by Digital Literacy Support". Technology in Society 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.001
Torres Albero, C., J. M. Robles Morales y O. Molina Molina. 2011. "¿Por qué usamos las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones? Un estudio sobre las bases sociales de la utilidad individual de Internet". Revista Internacional de Sociología 69(2): 371-392. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2010.01.15
Torres Albero, C., J. M. Robles, S. De Marco y M. Antino. 2017. "Revisión analítica del modelo de aceptación de la tecnología. El cambio tecnológico". Papers 102(1): 5-27. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2233
Van Deursen, A. y J. Van Dijk. 2014. "The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage". New Media & Society 16(3): 507- 526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959
Van Deursen, A. y J. Van Dijk. 2015. "Toward a Multifaceted Model of Internet Access for Understanding Digital Divides: An Empirical Investigation". The Information Society 31(5): 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770
Van Dijk, J. 2006. "Digital Divide Research, Achievements and Shortcomings". Poetics 34: 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
Zhong, Z. 2011. "From Access to Usage: The Divide of Self-reported Digital Skills among Adolescents". Computers & Education, 56: 736-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.016
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.








