Argumentos Comestibles. La construcción retórica de la percepción pública de los alimentos transgénicos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2005.i40.225Keywords:
Genetically ModifiedFood, Rlietorical Strategies, Illustrate/Romantic ThoughtAbstract
The main goal of this paper is to analyze how the difíerent types of reasons are constructed in order to créate one public perception or another about genetically modified food. Despite the apparent newness of this kind of foods, these reasons can be assimilated to two fiindamental discourse formations with ampie presence in all the scientific discoveríes. When modelling our analysis on these two rhetorical strategies —that we called 'illustrate' and 'romantic'— the latent presuppositions of the social agents considered and the preconceptions that these agents try to induce in the public opinión are shown. It is also shown a series of important shades and directions that usually escape to the more common analysis in terms of 'pros' and 'cons' genetically modified food.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-04-30
How to Cite
Herrera Racionero, P. (2005). Argumentos Comestibles. La construcción retórica de la percepción pública de los alimentos transgénicos. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 63(40), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2005.i40.225
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.