La centralidad de los criterios de merecimiento en la explicación de las actitudes hacia la condicionalidad de la política social

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2020.78.1.18.037

Palabras clave:

Actitudes hacia el bienestar, Estado de bienestar, Homo reciprocans, Percepción de merecimiento, Políticas de activación laboral

Resumen


Las políticas de activación laboral y el paradigma de la inversión social han promovido el debate acerca de la evolución de los estados de bienestar hacia una mayor condicionalidad de la política social. Este estudio explora el papel de los criterios de merecimiento y sus interacciones con el autointerés y la ideología para entender cómo las personas desarrollan actitudes específicas hacia la condicionalidad de la política social. Las conclusiones se extraen a través del análisis de la literatura y de una encuesta de opinión pública en Cataluña que presenta una oportunidad única para desarrollar una estrategia empírica fundamentada en la distinción teórica entre criterios de merecimiento y condicionalidad de la política social. El análisis evidencia el poder explicativo de los criterios de merecimiento y cómo estos interfieren con el autointerés y la ideología. Los hallazgos son específicamente relevantes para la comunicación política.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Andreß, H-J. y T. Heien. 2001. "Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States". European Sociological Review 17(4):337-356. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/17.4.337

Arts, W. y J. Gelissen. 2001. "Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?". Acta Sociologica 44(4):283-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930104400401

Bonoli, G. 2010. "The Political Economy of Active Labor-Market Policy". Politics & Society 38(4):435-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210381235

Bowles, S. y H. Gintis. 2000. "Reciprocity, self-interest and the welfare state". Nordic Journal of Political Economy 26:33-53.

Calzada, I., M. Gómez-Garrido, L. Moreno y F.J. Moreno-Fuentes. 2014. "It Is Not Only about Equality. A Study on the (Other) Values That Ground Attitudes to the Welfare State". International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(2):178-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt044

Calzada, I. y E. Del Pino. 2016. "Actitudes ante la redistribución: ¿Cómo ha afectado la crisis?". Revista Española del Tercer Sector (33):65-90.

Chong, D., J. Citrin y P. Conley. 2001. "When Self-Interest Matters". Political Psychology 22(3):541-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00253

Chong, D. y J.N. Druckman. 2007. "Framing theory". Annual Review of Political Science 10:103-126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

Clasen, J. y D. Clegg. 2007. "Chapter 8: Levels and levers of conditionality: measuring change within welfare states". Pp. 166-197 en Investigating welfare state change. The dependent variable problem in comparative analysis, editado por J. Clasen y N. A. Siegel. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Conybeare, J. A. C. 2007. «Efficiency, Entitlements and Deservingness: Perspectives on International Distributive Justice». Review of International Political Economy 14(3):389-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701395668

Cosmides, L. y J. Tooby. 2006. "Heuristics and the Law". editado por G. Gigerenzer y C. Engel. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Delton, A.W., L. Cosmides, M. Guemo, T.E. Robertson y J. Tooby. 2012. "The psychosemantics of free riding: Dissecting the architecture of a moral concept". Journal of personality and social psychology 102:1252-1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027026 PMid:22268815 PMCid:PMC3365621

Delton, A.W., M.B. Petersen, P. DeScioli y T.E. Robertson. 2018. "Need, Compassion, and Support for Social Welfare". Political Psychology 39(4):907-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12450

Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Feather, N.T. 2003. "Distinguishing between deservingness and entitlement: earned outcomes versus lawful outcomes". European Journal of Social Psychology 33:367-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.152

Feather, N.T. 2006. "Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes". European Review of Social Psychology 17:38-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600662321

Fletcher, D.R. y S. Wright. 2018. "A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising benefit claimants in Britain via strategies of surveillance, sanctions and deterrence". Critical Social Policy 38(2):323-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317726622

Gaeta, G.L. 2012. "In the mood for redistribution. An empirical analysis of individual preferences for redistribution in Italy". Economics Bulletin 32(3):2382-2398.

González Begega, S. y E. Del Pino. 2017. "From letting Europe in to policy conditionality. Welfare reform in Spain under Austerity". Working paper 2017-01. Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP) CSIC. Madrid.

Jæger, M.M. 2006. "What Makes People Support Public Responsibility for Welfare Provision: Self-interest or Political Ideology? A longitudinal approach". Acta Sociologica 49(3):321-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306067718

Jæger, M.M. 2008. "Does left-right orientation have a causal effect on support for redistribution? Causal analysis with cross-sectional data using instrumental variables". International Journal of Public Opinion Research 20(3):363-374. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn030

Jæger, M.M. 2009. "United But Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution". European Sociological Review 25(6):723-737. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn079

Jeene, M., W. van Oorschot, y W. Uunk. 2013. "Popular Criteria for the Welfare Deservingness of Disability Pensioneres: The Influence of Structural and Cultural Factors". Social Indicators Research 110(3):1103-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7 PMid:23329864 PMCid:PMC3545196

Kulin, J. y S. Svallfors. 2013. "Class, Values, and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: A European Comparison". European Sociological Review 29(2):155-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr046

León, F.J. 2012. "Reciprocity and Public Support for the redistributive role of the State". Journal of European Social Policy 22(2):198-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711433657

Leoni, T. 2015. "Welfare state adjustment to new social risks in the post-crisis scenario. A review with focus on the social investment perspective". WWWforEurope Working Papers series 89, WWWforEurope.

Linos, K. y M. West. 2003. "Self-Interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution: Re-Addressing the Issue of Cross-National Variation". European Sociological Review 19(4):393-409. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.4.393

Mau, S. 2003. The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Compared. Londres: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203590614

Meuleman, B. et al. 2018. Pasado, presente y futuro de las actitudes sobre el bienestar social en Europa: Principales resultados de la octava edición de la Encuesta Social Europea. Londres.

Moreno, L. y A. Serrano-Pascual. 2007. "Europeización del Bienestar y activación". Política y Sociedad 44(2): 31-44.

Noguera, J.A. dir. 2011. Valors i actituds sobre justícia distributiva: prestacions socials i fiscalitat. Barcelona: Centre d'Estudis d'Opinió, Generalitat de Catalunya.

Noya, J. 2004. Ciudadanos ambivalentes. Actitudes ante la igualdad y el Estado de Bienestar en España. Colección. Madrid: CIS-Siglo XXI de España Editores.

Petersen, M.B. y L. Aarøe. 2012. "Is the political animal politically ignorant? Applying Evolutionary Psychology to the Study of Political Attitudes". Evolutionary Psychology 10(5):802-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000504 PMid:23253787

Petersen, M.B., R. Slothuus, R. Stubager y L. Togeby. 2010. "Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heurisheuristic". European Journal of Political Research 50:24-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01923.x

Petersen, M. B., R. Slothuus y L. Togeby. 2010. "Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation". Public Opinion Quarterly 74(3):530-550. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq005

Petersen, M.B., D. Sznycer, L. Cosmides y J. Tooby. 2012. "Who deserves help? Evolutionary Psychology, social emotions and public opinion about welfare". Political Psychology 33(3):395-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00883.x PMid:23355755 PMCid:PMC3551585

Pino, E. del e I. Calzada. 2013. "La imaginación da el poder: estrategias políticas para evitar el castigo electoral y reformar el estado de bienestar" en Los Estados de Bienestar en la encrucijada. Políticas Sociales en perspectiva comparada, editado por E. del Pino y M. J. R. Lara. Madrid: Tecnos.

Reeskens, T. y W. van Oorschot. 2012. "Disentangling the 'New Liberal Dilemma': On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism". Journal of Comparative Sociology 53(2):120-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715212451987

Reeskens, T. y W. van Oorschot. 2015. "Immigrants' Attitudes towards Welfare Redistribution. An Exploration of Role of Government Preferences among Immigrants and Natives across 18 European Welfare States". European Sociological Review 31(4):433-445. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv003

Roosma, F. 2016. A Multidimensional Perspective on the Social Legitimacy of Welfare States in Europe. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint.

Schwartz, S. 2006. "A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications". Comparative Sociology 5(2-3):137-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357

Slothuus, R. 2007. "Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment". Scandinavian Political Studies 30(3):323-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00183.x

Stegmueller, D., P. Scheepers, S. Roßteutscher y E. de Jong. 2012. "Support for Redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the role of religion." European Sociological Review 28(4):482-497. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr011

Stiefken, P. 2014. "Altruismo y solidaridad en el Estado de Bienestar". Ph.D. dissertation. Departamento de Sociología. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Barcelona.

Sundberg, T. 2014. "Attitudes to the Welfare State: A Systematic Review Approach to the Example of Ethnically Diverse Welfare States". Sociological Research Online 19(1):202-213. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3337

Svallfors, S. 1997. "Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations". European Sociological Review 13(3):283-304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219

Taylor-Gooby, P., B. Hvinden, S. Mau, B. Leruth, M. A. Schoyen, y A. Gyory. 2018. «Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study». Acta Sociologica 62(2):119-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699318774835

Van Oorschot, W. 1998. "Deservingness and conditionality of solidarity". Sociale Wetenschappen 41(3):54-78.

Van Oorschot, W. 2000. «Who should get what and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public». Policy and Politics 28(1):33-49. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500811

Van Oorschot, W. y F. Roosma. 2015. "The social legitimacy of differently targeted benefits". ImPRovE Working Paper No. 15/11. Antwerp: Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy (University of Antwerp).

Weber, C.R. y C.M. Federico. 2013. "Moral Foundations and Heterogeneity in Ideological Preferences". Political Psychology 34(1):107-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00922.x

Wright, S. 2016. "Conceptualising the active welfare subject: welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience." Policy and Politics 44(2):235-252. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X13904856745154

Yamagishi, T., N. Mifune, J.H. Liu y J. Pauling. 2008. "Exchanges of group-based favours: Ingroup bias in the prisoner's dilemma game with minimal groups in Japan and New Zealand". Asian Journal of Social Psychology 11:196-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00258.x

Publicado

2020-03-30

Cómo citar

Guijarro Rubinat, X. (2020). La centralidad de los criterios de merecimiento en la explicación de las actitudes hacia la condicionalidad de la política social. Revista Internacional De Sociología, 78(1), e149. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2020.78.1.18.037

Número

Sección

Artículos